QBER vs. KQQQ
QBER (TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF) and KQQQ (Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QBER is a Options Trading fund actively managed by TrueShares, while KQQQ is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Kurv. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QBER returned -0.72% vs 40.36% for KQQQ. At a correlation of -0.49, they often move in opposite directions. QBER charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for KQQQ.
Performance
QBER vs. KQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBER achieves a -0.83% return, which is significantly lower than KQQQ's 17.96% return.
QBER
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- -0.83%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- -0.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KQQQ
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 17.96%
- 6M
- 18.45%
- 1Y
- 40.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBER vs. KQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QBER TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF | -0.83% | 0.25% | 0.16% |
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF | 17.96% | 16.64% | 11.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBER and KQQQ is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | -0.49 |
The correlation between QBER and KQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.50 to -0.49 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBER vs. KQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
QBER
KQQQ
QBER vs. KQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) and Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBER | KQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.35 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 2.28 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 7.43 | -7.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBER vs. KQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBER drawdown since its inception was -5.72%, smaller than the maximum KQQQ drawdown of -26.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBER and KQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBER | KQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.72% | -26.15% | +20.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.35% | -17.30% | +14.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.56% | -2.05% | -3.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -4.69% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 5.31% | -4.26% |
Volatility
QBER vs. KQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) is 1.00%, while Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) has a volatility of 7.91%. This indicates that QBER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBER | KQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 7.91% | -6.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.91% | 15.75% | -12.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.68% | 19.27% | -15.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.34% | 23.68% | -17.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.34% | 23.68% | -17.34% |
QBER vs. KQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBER has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than KQQQ's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBER vs. KQQQ - Dividend Comparison
QBER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than KQQQ's 13.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF | 13.87% | 12.01% | 2.48% |
QBER TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF | 3.29% | 3.26% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBER and KQQQ have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KQQQ has higher volatility (7.91%) compared to QBER (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBER dropped -5.72% vs KQQQ's -26.15%.
On 1-year performance, KQQQ leads with 40.36% vs -0.72% for QBER. On fees, QBER is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QBER has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KQQQ has performed better with a 40.36% return vs -0.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QBER is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KQQQ.
KQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 13.87%, compared with 3.29% for QBER.
QBER is categorized as Options Trading, while KQQQ is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QBER and 0.99% for KQQQ.
KQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QBER and KQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer