PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBER vs. KQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBER vs. KQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) and Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBER achieves a -0.83% return, which is significantly lower than KQQQ's 17.96% return.


QBER

1D
-0.29%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
-0.83%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
-0.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KQQQ

1D
2.35%
1M
1.74%
YTD
17.96%
6M
18.45%
1Y
40.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBER vs. KQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QBER
TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF
-0.83%0.25%0.16%
KQQQ
Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF
17.96%16.64%11.50%

Correlation

The correlation between QBER and KQQQ is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024

-0.49

The correlation between QBER and KQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.50 to -0.49 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBER vs. KQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBER
QBER Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
QBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBER Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBER Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

KQQQ
KQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
KQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
KQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
KQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
KQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBER vs. KQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) and Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QBERKQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.35

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

2.28

-2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.50

7.43

-7.93

QBER vs. KQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBER Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the KQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBER and KQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QBER vs. KQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBER drawdown since its inception was -5.72%, smaller than the maximum KQQQ drawdown of -26.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBER and KQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBERKQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

-26.15%

+20.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.35%

-17.30%

+14.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.56%

-2.05%

-3.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-4.69%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

5.31%

-4.26%

Volatility

QBER vs. KQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) is 1.00%, while Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) has a volatility of 7.91%. This indicates that QBER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBERKQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

7.91%

-6.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.91%

15.75%

-12.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.68%

19.27%

-15.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.34%

23.68%

-17.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.34%

23.68%

-17.34%

QBER vs. KQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBER has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than KQQQ's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBER vs. KQQQ - Dividend Comparison

QBER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than KQQQ's 13.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
KQQQ
Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF
13.87%12.01%2.48%
QBER
TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF
3.29%3.26%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


QBER and KQQQ have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KQQQ has higher volatility (7.91%) compared to QBER (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBER dropped -5.72% vs KQQQ's -26.15%.

On 1-year performance, KQQQ leads with 40.36% vs -0.72% for QBER. On fees, QBER is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QBER has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KQQQ has performed better with a 40.36% return vs -0.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QBER is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KQQQ.

KQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 13.87%, compared with 3.29% for QBER.

QBER is categorized as Options Trading, while KQQQ is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QBER and 0.99% for KQQQ.

KQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBER and KQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer