QBER vs. AUGZ
QBER (TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF) and AUGZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QBER is a Options Trading fund actively managed by TrueShares, while AUGZ is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. QBER is actively managed, while AUGZ is passively managed. Over the past year, QBER returned -0.73% vs 15.39% for AUGZ. Their -0.51 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
QBER vs. AUGZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBER achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than AUGZ's 7.11% return.
QBER
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 1Y
- -0.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.11%
AUGZ
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 6.16%
- YTD
- 7.11%
- 1Y
- 15.39%
- 3Y*
- 14.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.79%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $28.12K | $49.05K | $654.57K | |
| $350.41K | $265.27K | $646.25K |
QBER vs. AUGZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QBER TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF | -0.52% | 0.25% | 0.04% |
AUGZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF | 7.11% | 13.49% | 5.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBER and AUGZ is -0.55, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2024 | -0.51 |
The correlation between QBER and AUGZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.55 to -0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBER vs. AUGZ — Risk / Return Rank
QBER
AUGZ
QBER vs. AUGZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBER | AUGZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.22 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 1.86 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.21 | 7.17 | -7.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBER vs. AUGZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBER drawdown since its inception was -5.72%, smaller than the maximum AUGZ drawdown of -15.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBER and AUGZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBER | AUGZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.72% | -15.67% | +9.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.35% | -7.23% | +4.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.27% | -1.62% | -3.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.75% | -3.08% | -1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.21% | 1.88% | -0.67% |
Volatility
QBER vs. AUGZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) is 1.15%, while TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ) has a volatility of 3.20%. This indicates that QBER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUGZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBER | AUGZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 3.20% | -2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | 8.50% | -5.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 10.58% | -6.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.24% | 12.10% | -5.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.24% | 12.13% | -5.89% |
QBER vs. AUGZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QBER and AUGZ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
QBER vs. AUGZ - Dividend Comparison
QBER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than AUGZ's 3.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUGZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF | 3.39% | 3.63% | 4.08% | 3.42% | 0.41% |
QBER TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF | 3.28% | 3.26% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBER and AUGZ have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AUGZ has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to QBER (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBER dropped -5.72% vs AUGZ's -15.67%.
On 1-year performance, AUGZ leads with 15.39% vs -0.73% for QBER. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, QBER has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AUGZ has performed better with a 15.39% return vs -0.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QBER and AUGZ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
AUGZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 3.28% for QBER.
QBER is categorized as Options Trading, while AUGZ is Defined Outcome.
AUGZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QBER and AUGZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer