QBDSX vs. FSRRX
QBDSX (Quantified Managed Income Fund) and FSRRX (Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, QBDSX returned 0.56%/yr vs 5.50%/yr for FSRRX. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QBDSX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FSRRX.
Performance
QBDSX vs. FSRRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBDSX achieves a -0.25% return, which is significantly lower than FSRRX's 8.14% return. Over the past 10 years, QBDSX has underperformed FSRRX with an annualized return of 0.56%, while FSRRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.50% annualized return.
QBDSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- -0.25%
- 1Y
- 0.15%
- 3Y*
- 2.28%
- 5Y*
- 0.70%
- 10Y*
- 0.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.75%
FSRRX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 5.41%
- YTD
- 8.14%
- 1Y
- 14.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.77%
- 10Y*
- 5.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
QBDSX vs. FSRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund | -0.25% | 5.11% | 1.02% | 2.25% | -4.09% | -0.66% | -9.22% | 10.50% | -3.17% | 5.05% |
FSRRX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund | 8.14% | 10.45% | 5.84% | 4.59% | -3.34% | 15.84% | 3.74% | 10.48% | -3.99% | 3.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBDSX and FSRRX is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBDSX vs. FSRRX — Risk / Return Rank
QBDSX
FSRRX
QBDSX vs. FSRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBDSX | FSRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.59 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 4.23 | -4.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 15.07 | -15.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBDSX vs. FSRRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBDSX drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum FSRRX drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBDSX and FSRRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBDSX | FSRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -33.42% | +15.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.09% | -3.42% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.76% | -5.80% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.40% | -12.78% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.38% | -19.93% | +1.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.29% | -1.22% | -7.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -4.20% | -2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 0.96% | +0.47% |
Volatility
QBDSX vs. FSRRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) is 0.75%, while Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that QBDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBDSX | FSRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 1.25% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.38% | 3.76% | -1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52% | 4.85% | -1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.31% | 6.87% | -2.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.24% | 6.72% | -1.48% |
QBDSX vs. FSRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBDSX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRRX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBDSX vs. FSRRX - Dividend Comparison
QBDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, less than FSRRX's 4.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRRX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund | 4.59% | 4.68% | 4.82% | 5.29% | 7.31% | 5.35% | 2.25% | 3.05% | 9.39% | 1.57% | 2.34% | 1.75% |
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund | 4.49% | 4.47% | 3.98% | 4.51% | 0.54% | 0.71% | 0.87% | 2.26% | 2.04% | 2.51% | 1.00% | 3.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBDSX and FSRRX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSRRX has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to QBDSX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBDSX dropped -18.38% vs FSRRX's -33.42%.
FSRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QBDSX and FSRRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer