PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSRRX vs. INPFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSRRX vs. INPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) and American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRRX achieves a 8.37% return, which is significantly higher than INPFX's 5.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRRX has underperformed INPFX with an annualized return of 5.49%, while INPFX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.02% annualized return.


FSRRX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.05%
6M
4.71%
YTD
8.37%
1Y
14.75%
3Y*
8.64%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
5.49%
ALL TIME*
4.03%

INPFX

1D
0.48%
1M
0.14%
6M
3.63%
YTD
5.60%
1Y
11.79%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
7.02%
ALL TIME*
7.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSRRX vs. INPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSRRX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund
8.37%10.45%5.84%4.59%-3.34%15.84%3.74%10.48%-3.99%3.00%
INPFX
American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1
5.60%14.29%9.20%9.46%-8.74%12.90%5.67%15.76%-3.57%11.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRRX and INPFX is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012

0.63

The correlation between FSRRX and INPFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSRRX vs. INPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSRRX
FSRRX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FSRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

INPFX
INPFX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
INPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
INPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
INPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
INPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSRRX vs. INPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) and American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSRRXINPFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.34

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

2.14

+2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.82

9.03

+5.79

FSRRX vs. INPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the INPFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRRX and INPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSRRX vs. INPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRRX drawdown since its inception was -33.42%, which is greater than INPFX's maximum drawdown of -21.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRRX and INPFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSRRXINPFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.42%

-21.31%

-12.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.42%

-5.20%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.80%

-7.02%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.78%

-15.37%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.93%

-21.31%

+1.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-0.14%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-2.28%

-1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

1.23%

-0.28%

Volatility

FSRRX vs. INPFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) is 1.25%, while American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that FSRRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSRRXINPFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

1.41%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.77%

4.90%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.90%

6.13%

-1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.87%

7.54%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.72%

8.31%

-1.59%

FSRRX vs. INPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than INPFX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSRRX vs. INPFX - Dividend Comparison

FSRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than INPFX's 5.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRRX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund
4.58%4.68%4.82%5.29%7.31%5.35%2.25%3.05%9.39%1.57%2.34%1.75%
INPFX
American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1
5.39%5.61%5.15%4.76%4.84%4.38%5.54%4.53%4.79%3.25%3.53%3.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSRRX and INPFX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INPFX has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to FSRRX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRRX dropped -33.42% vs INPFX's -21.31%.

FSRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSRRX and INPFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer