QBDSX vs. CDGRX
QBDSX (Quantified Managed Income Fund) and CDGRX (Copeland Dividend Growth Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, QBDSX returned 0.56%/yr vs 11.16%/yr for CDGRX. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QBDSX charges 1.31%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for CDGRX.
Performance
QBDSX vs. CDGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBDSX achieves a -0.25% return, which is significantly lower than CDGRX's 6.72% return. Over the past 10 years, QBDSX has underperformed CDGRX with an annualized return of 0.56%, while CDGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.16% annualized return.
QBDSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- -0.25%
- 1Y
- 0.15%
- 3Y*
- 2.28%
- 5Y*
- 0.70%
- 10Y*
- 0.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.75%
CDGRX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 3.17%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 1Y
- 12.80%
- 3Y*
- 9.61%
- 5Y*
- 6.93%
- 10Y*
- 11.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
QBDSX vs. CDGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund | -0.25% | 5.11% | 1.02% | 2.25% | -4.09% | -0.66% | -9.22% | 10.50% | -3.17% | 5.05% |
CDGRX Copeland Dividend Growth Fund | 6.72% | 8.70% | 9.79% | 18.80% | -14.83% | 26.29% | 3.69% | 42.03% | 0.22% | 19.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBDSX and CDGRX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, QBDSX and CDGRX have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.42, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBDSX vs. CDGRX — Risk / Return Rank
QBDSX
CDGRX
QBDSX vs. CDGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) and Copeland Dividend Growth Fund (CDGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBDSX | CDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.17 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 1.43 | -1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 5.99 | -6.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBDSX vs. CDGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBDSX drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum CDGRX drawdown of -36.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBDSX and CDGRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBDSX | CDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -36.25% | +17.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.09% | -8.37% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.76% | -19.94% | +16.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.40% | -22.21% | +14.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.38% | -36.25% | +17.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.29% | 0.00% | -8.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -5.19% | -1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 1.99% | -0.56% |
Volatility
QBDSX vs. CDGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) is 0.75%, while Copeland Dividend Growth Fund (CDGRX) has a volatility of 2.59%. This indicates that QBDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBDSX | CDGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 2.59% | -1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.38% | 9.18% | -6.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52% | 12.10% | -8.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.31% | 16.52% | -12.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.24% | 18.84% | -13.60% |
QBDSX vs. CDGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBDSX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than CDGRX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBDSX vs. CDGRX - Dividend Comparison
QBDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, less than CDGRX's 8.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDGRX Copeland Dividend Growth Fund | 8.76% | 9.35% | 13.93% | 3.68% | 7.00% | 11.95% | 0.00% | 41.54% | 8.40% | 4.22% | 3.79% | 12.12% |
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund | 4.49% | 4.47% | 3.98% | 4.51% | 0.54% | 0.71% | 0.87% | 2.26% | 2.04% | 2.51% | 1.00% | 3.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBDSX and CDGRX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDGRX has higher volatility (2.59%) compared to QBDSX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBDSX dropped -18.38% vs CDGRX's -36.25%.
CDGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QBDSX and CDGRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer