CDGRX vs. TPDAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CDGRX (Copeland Dividend Growth Fund) and TPDAX (Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, CDGRX returned 11.11%/yr vs 7.18%/yr for TPDAX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CDGRX charges 1.20%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for TPDAX.

Performance

CDGRX vs. TPDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Copeland Dividend Growth Fund (CDGRX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDGRX achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly lower than TPDAX's 10.96% return. Over the past 10 years, CDGRX has outperformed TPDAX with an annualized return of 11.11%, while TPDAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.18% annualized return.

CDGRX

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 1.19%
• YTD: 4.92%
• 6M: 5.22%
• 1Y: 12.86%
• 3Y*: 11.91%
• 5Y*: 7.45%
• 10Y*: 11.11%

TPDAX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: 10.96%
• 6M: 11.99%
• 1Y: 25.38%
• 3Y*: 15.44%
• 5Y*: 8.65%
• 10Y*: 7.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDGRX vs. TPDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CDGRX Copeland Dividend Growth Fund	4.92%	8.70%	9.79%	18.80%	-14.83%	26.29%	3.69%	42.03%	0.22%	19.27%
TPDAX Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund	10.96%	23.97%	5.29%	7.71%	-5.63%	12.15%	8.83%	13.77%	-7.24%	4.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CDGRX and TPDAX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2010	0.58

The correlation between CDGRX and TPDAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CDGRX vs. TPDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDGRX

CDGRX Risk / Return Rank: 20
CDGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
CDGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
CDGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
CDGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
CDGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

TPDAX

TPDAX Risk / Return Rank: 59
TPDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
TPDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
TPDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
TPDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
TPDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDGRX vs. TPDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copeland Dividend Growth Fund (CDGRX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CDGRX	TPDAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	2.28	-1.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	2.92	-1.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.43	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	3.34	-1.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.87	11.51	-4.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CDGRX vs. TPDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the TPDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDGRX and TPDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CDGRX	TPDAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.17	2.28	-1.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.85	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.73	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.60	-0.01

Drawdowns

CDGRX vs. TPDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDGRX drawdown since its inception was -36.25%, which is greater than TPDAX's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDGRX and TPDAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CDGRX	TPDAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.25%	-22.29%	-13.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.37%	-7.58%	-0.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.94%	-7.58%	-12.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.21%	-17.58%	-4.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.25%	-22.29%	-13.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-3.53%	+3.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.24%	-4.92%	-0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	2.20%	-0.22%

Volatility

CDGRX vs. TPDAX - Volatility Comparison

Copeland Dividend Growth Fund (CDGRX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) have volatilities of 2.98% and 2.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CDGRX	TPDAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.98%	2.91%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.96%	9.47%	-0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.67%	11.17%	+0.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.50%	10.18%	+6.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.78%	9.90%	+8.88%

CDGRX vs. TPDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDGRX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TPDAX's 1.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

CDGRX vs. TPDAX - Dividend Comparison

CDGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.91%, more than TPDAX's 0.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDGRX Copeland Dividend Growth Fund	8.91%	9.35%	13.93%	3.68%	7.00%	11.95%	0.00%	41.54%	8.40%	4.22%	3.79%	12.12%
TPDAX Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund	0.72%	0.80%	2.76%	2.35%	4.48%	0.50%	0.00%	2.89%	2.69%	0.13%	0.33%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CDGRX and TPDAX in my portfolio?

CDGRX and TPDAX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CDGRX or TPDAX?

CDGRX has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to TPDAX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDGRX dropped -36.25% vs TPDAX's -22.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TPDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.