QB vs. USD
QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) and USD (ProShares Ultra Semiconductors) are both exchange-traded funds - QB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Nasdaq-100, while USD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QB returned 18.83% vs 145.11% for USD. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QB charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for USD.
Performance
QB vs. USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QB achieves a 12.67% return, which is significantly lower than USD's 81.18% return.
QB
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- 6M
- 11.39%
- YTD
- 12.67%
- 1Y
- 18.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USD
- 1D
- 6.38%
- 1M
- -3.04%
- 6M
- 68.72%
- YTD
- 81.18%
- 1Y
- 145.11%
- 3Y*
- 104.08%
- 5Y*
- 63.45%
- 10Y*
- 58.18%
QB vs. USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 12.67% | 6.10% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 81.18% | 48.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between QB and USD is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.65 |
The correlation between QB and USD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
QB vs. USD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QB
USD
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QB
USD
Communication Services
QB
USD
-
Consumer Cyclical
QB
USD
-
Consumer Defensive
QB
USD
-
Healthcare
QB
USD
-
Industrials
QB
USD
-
Utilities
QB
USD
-
Basic Materials
QB
USD
-
Energy
QB
USD
Financial Services
QB
USD
Real Estate
QB
USD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QB vs. USD — Risk / Return Rank
QB
USD
QB vs. USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QB | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.31 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.44 | 4.59 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.25 | 11.97 | +14.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QB vs. USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QB drawdown since its inception was -3.47%, smaller than the maximum USD drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QB and USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QB | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.47% | -88.63% | +85.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.47% | -31.80% | +28.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -64.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -77.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -77.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -16.30% | +16.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -32.25% | +31.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 12.17% | -11.45% |
Volatility
QB vs. USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) is 2.86%, while ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a volatility of 31.36%. This indicates that QB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QB | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 31.36% | -28.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.82% | 57.84% | -52.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.03% | 70.75% | -63.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.93% | 78.26% | -71.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.93% | 70.08% | -63.15% |
QB vs. USD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than USD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
QB vs. USD - Dividend Comparison
QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, more than USD's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 0.77% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 0.32% | 0.39% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.72% | 0.93% | 0.32% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QB and USD have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USD has higher volatility (31.36%) compared to QB (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QB dropped -3.47% vs USD's -88.63%.
On 1-year performance, USD leads with 145.11% vs 18.83% for QB. On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, QB has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USD has performed better with a 145.11% return vs 18.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for USD.
QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.32% for USD.
QB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while USD is Leveraged Equities. QB tracks Nasdaq-100, while USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QB and 0.95% for USD.
QB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QB and USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer