QB vs. USD
QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) and USD (ProShares Ultra Semiconductors) are both exchange-traded funds - QB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Nasdaq-100, while USD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). Both are passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QB charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for USD.
Performance
QB vs. USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QB achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly lower than USD's 84.65% return.
QB
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 9.56%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USD
- 1D
- -12.35%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 84.65%
- 6M
- 79.76%
- 1Y
- 206.76%
- 3Y*
- 114.28%
- 5Y*
- 63.13%
- 10Y*
- 61.02%
QB vs. USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 9.56% | 6.10% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 84.65% | 48.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between QB and USD is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.64 |
QB vs. USD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QB
USD
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QB
USD
Communication Services
QB
USD
-
Consumer Cyclical
QB
USD
-
Consumer Defensive
QB
USD
-
Healthcare
QB
USD
-
Industrials
QB
USD
-
Utilities
QB
USD
-
Basic Materials
QB
USD
-
Energy
QB
USD
Financial Services
QB
USD
Real Estate
QB
USD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QB vs. USD — Risk / Return Rank
QB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USD
QB vs. USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QB | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.54 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QB vs. USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QB drawdown since its inception was -3.47%, smaller than the maximum USD drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QB and USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QB | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.47% | -88.63% | +85.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -31.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -64.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -77.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -77.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -14.69% | +13.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.41% | -32.29% | +31.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.44% | — |
Volatility
QB vs. USD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QB | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 34.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 54.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.85% | 67.96% | -61.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.85% | 77.73% | -70.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.85% | 69.83% | -62.98% |
QB vs. USD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than USD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
QB vs. USD - Dividend Comparison
QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than USD's 0.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 0.63% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 0.25% | 0.39% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.72% | 0.93% | 0.32% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QB and USD have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for USD.
QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.25% for USD.
QB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while USD is Leveraged Equities. QB tracks Nasdaq-100, while USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QB and 0.95% for USD.
Find the right allocation for QB and USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer