PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QARP vs. RFDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QARP vs. RFDA

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) and RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. QARP is passively managed, while RFDA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QARP returned 11.66%/yr vs 12.74%/yr for RFDA. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QARP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for RFDA.

Performance

QARP vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QARP achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly lower than RFDA's 10.33% return.

QARP

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.50%
YTD
9.20%
6M
8.29%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*
—

RFDA

1D
-0.39%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
10.33%
6M
9.16%
1Y
25.01%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*
13.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QARP vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF		9.20%13.99%18.94%23.03%-14.62%31.82%14.83%30.70%-5.53%
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF		10.33%16.42%20.12%16.98%-8.58%25.94%11.26%27.15%-8.94%

Correlation

The correlation between QARP and RFDA is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018

0.88

The correlation between QARP and RFDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QARP vs. RFDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
QARP
RFDA

Technology

24.6%
21.1%

Communication Services

14.4%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

13.1%
7.4%

Healthcare

10.9%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

9.8%
7.0%

Financial Services

9.6%
14.4%

Industrials

8.8%
8.6%

Energy

6.0%
11.7%

Basic Materials

2.1%
1.9%

Real Estate

0.6%
4.9%

Utilities

0.3%
4.8%

Technology

QARP
24.6%
RFDA
21.1%

Communication Services

QARP
14.4%
RFDA
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QARP
13.1%
RFDA
7.4%

Healthcare

QARP
10.9%
RFDA
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

QARP
9.8%
RFDA
7.0%

Financial Services

QARP
9.6%
RFDA
14.4%

Industrials

QARP
8.8%
RFDA
8.6%

Energy

QARP
6.0%
RFDA
11.7%

Basic Materials

QARP
2.1%
RFDA
1.9%

Real Estate

QARP
0.6%
RFDA
4.9%

Utilities

QARP
0.3%
RFDA
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF

RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF

Often compared with QARP:
QARP vs. SPHQQARP vs. IWBQARP vs. VOOQARP vs. SPYQARP vs. IWYQARP vs. OMFLQARP vs. ROBT
Often compared with RFDA:
RFDA vs. DGRORFDA vs. DIVBRFDA vs. AGGRFDA vs. BWXRFDA vs. HYGRFDA vs. SCHDRFDA vs. IAU

Return for Risk

QARP vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
RFDA
RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QARP vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

QARPRFDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.11
2.15

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.98
2.98

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.40

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

4.61

-1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.86

16.42

-2.56

QARP vs. RFDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QARP Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the RFDA Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QARP and RFDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QARP vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QARP drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, roughly equal to the maximum RFDA drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QARP and RFDA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QARPRFDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.44%

-34.60%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

-5.45%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.65%

-19.35%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-19.35%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-34.60%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

-2.06%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-3.73%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.53%

+0.09%

Volatility

QARP vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) at 3.21%. This indicates that QARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QARPRFDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

3.21%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.25%

8.78%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.69%

11.71%

-1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

15.75%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.61%

16.87%

+2.74%

QARP vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QARP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

QARP vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison

QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than RFDA's 1.81% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF		1.05%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%0.00%0.00%
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF		1.81%1.89%2.23%2.68%3.57%1.44%1.62%1.87%2.44%1.90%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

QARP and RFDA have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QARP has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to RFDA (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QARP dropped -35.44% vs RFDA's -34.60%.

On 5-year performance, RFDA leads with 12.74% vs 11.66% for QARP. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, RFDA has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RFDA has performed better with a 12.74% return vs 11.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RFDA.

RFDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.05% for QARP.

They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for QARP and 0.52% for RFDA.

RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QARP and RFDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer