QARP vs. MFUS
QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index while MFUS tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QARP returned 12.06%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for MFUS. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QARP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.
Performance
QARP vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QARP achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.37% return.
QARP
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 25.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 12.06%
- 10Y*
- —
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
QARP vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 10.34% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -5.53% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.37% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 10.64% | 26.17% | -7.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between QARP and MFUS is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between QARP and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
QARP vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QARP
MFUS
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
QARP
MFUS
Communication Services
QARP
MFUS
Consumer Cyclical
QARP
MFUS
Healthcare
QARP
MFUS
Consumer Defensive
QARP
MFUS
Financial Services
QARP
MFUS
Industrials
QARP
MFUS
Energy
QARP
MFUS
Basic Materials
QARP
MFUS
Real Estate
QARP
MFUS
Utilities
QARP
MFUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QARP vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank
QARP
MFUS
QARP vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QARP | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.47 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 4.41 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.79 | 18.13 | -2.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QARP | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.63 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.86 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.79 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
QARP vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QARP drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, roughly equal to the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QARP and MFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QARP | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.44% | -35.21% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.26% | -6.39% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.65% | -15.39% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.75% | -18.22% | -4.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | 0.00% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -4.00% | -0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 1.55% | +0.04% |
Volatility
QARP vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) is 2.21%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that QARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QARP | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | 3.19% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.71% | 8.22% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.36% | 10.72% | -0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 15.03% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 17.35% | +2.30% |
QARP vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QARP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
QARP vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison
QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than MFUS's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.36% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.03% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QARP and MFUS have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFUS has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to QARP (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QARP dropped -35.44% vs MFUS's -35.21%.
On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 12.82% vs 12.06% for QARP. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 12.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.03% for QARP.
QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for QARP and 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QARP and MFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer