QARP vs. IWLG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) and IWLG (NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. QARP is passively managed, while IWLG is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QARP returned 17.64%/yr vs 21.15%/yr for IWLG. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QARP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IWLG.

Performance

QARP vs. IWLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF (IWLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QARP achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly higher than IWLG's 1.43% return.

QARP

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -1.50%
• YTD: 9.20%
• 6M: 8.29%
• 1Y: 22.43%
• 3Y*: 17.64%
• 5Y*: 11.66%
• 10Y*: —

IWLG

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: -0.03%
• 1Y: 8.98%
• 3Y*: 21.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QARP vs. IWLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF	9.20%	13.99%	18.94%	23.03%	5.17%
IWLG NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF	1.43%	14.73%	31.47%	43.25%	1.48%

Correlation

The correlation between QARP and IWLG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2022	0.80

The correlation between QARP and IWLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

QARP vs. IWLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QARP	IWLG
Technology	24.6%	49.3%
Communication Services	14.4%	12.3%
Consumer Cyclical	13.1%	8.8%
Healthcare	10.9%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	9.8%	1.8%
Financial Services	9.6%	5.2%
Industrials	8.8%	14.8%
Energy	6.0%	-
Basic Materials	2.1%	1.2%
Real Estate	0.6%	-
Utilities	0.3%	1.2%

Return for Risk

QARP vs. IWLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QARP

QARP Risk / Return Rank: 75
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 80

IWLG

IWLG Risk / Return Rank: 16
IWLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
IWLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
IWLG Omega Ratio Rank: 16
IWLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
IWLG Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QARP vs. IWLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF (IWLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QARP	IWLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	0.51	+1.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	0.80	+2.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.10	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	0.46	+2.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.86	1.39	+12.47

QARP vs. IWLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QARP Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the IWLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QARP and IWLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QARP vs. IWLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QARP drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, which is greater than IWLG's maximum drawdown of -23.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QARP and IWLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QARP	IWLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.44%	-23.19%	-12.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.26%	-19.45%	+12.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.65%	-23.19%	+7.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.28%	-5.28%	+3.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.42%	-4.56%	+0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.62%	6.47%	-4.85%

Volatility

QARP vs. IWLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) is 3.61%, while NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF (IWLG) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that QARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QARP	IWLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.61%	7.68%	-4.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.25%	13.93%	-5.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.69%	17.63%	-6.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.55%	21.13%	-5.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.61%	21.13%	-1.52%

QARP vs. IWLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QARP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IWLG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QARP vs. IWLG - Dividend Comparison

QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while IWLG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IWLG NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.34%	0.01%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF	1.05%	1.14%	1.39%	1.28%	1.68%	1.34%	1.61%	1.85%	1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QARP and IWLG in my portfolio?

QARP and IWLG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QARP or IWLG?

IWLG has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to QARP (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QARP dropped -35.44% vs IWLG's -23.19%.

Which ETF is better, QARP or IWLG?

On 3-year performance, IWLG leads with 21.15% vs 17.64% for QARP. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QARP or IWLG?

Over the 3-year period, IWLG has performed better with a 21.15% return vs 17.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QARP or IWLG?

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IWLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QARP or IWLG?

QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for IWLG.

What is the main difference between QARP and IWLG?

They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and NYLI. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for QARP and 0.50% for IWLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.