PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QARP vs. IUSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QARP vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QARP achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly lower than IUSG's 14.00% return.


QARP

1D
0.89%
1M
2.56%
YTD
11.32%
6M
11.66%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
12.26%
10Y*

IUSG

1D
-0.07%
1M
6.40%
YTD
14.00%
6M
13.31%
1Y
33.47%
3Y*
27.62%
5Y*
15.67%
10Y*
17.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QARP vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
11.32%13.99%18.94%23.03%-14.62%31.82%14.83%30.70%-5.53%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
14.00%21.23%34.70%29.28%-28.81%31.26%32.65%30.62%-3.20%

Correlation

The correlation between QARP and IUSG is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018

0.86

The correlation between QARP and IUSG shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QARP vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QARP
IUSG

Technology

21.9%
48.0%

Communication Services

14.7%
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
9.3%

Healthcare

11.3%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

10.5%
1.0%

Financial Services

9.9%
8.8%

Industrials

9.0%
7.5%

Energy

6.5%
0.2%

Basic Materials

2.1%
0.5%

Real Estate

0.6%
0.9%

Utilities

0.3%
0.5%

Technology

QARP
21.9%
IUSG
48.0%

Communication Services

QARP
14.7%
IUSG
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

QARP
13.2%
IUSG
9.3%

Healthcare

QARP
11.3%
IUSG
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

QARP
10.5%
IUSG
1.0%

Financial Services

QARP
9.9%
IUSG
8.8%

Industrials

QARP
9.0%
IUSG
7.5%

Energy

QARP
6.5%
IUSG
0.2%

Basic Materials

QARP
2.1%
IUSG
0.5%

Real Estate

QARP
0.6%
IUSG
0.9%

Utilities

QARP
0.3%
IUSG
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QARP vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QARP vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QARPIUSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.37

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

2.57

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.57

10.95

+5.62

QARP vs. IUSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QARP Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the IUSG Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QARP and IUSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QARPIUSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

2.14

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.75

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.38

+0.34

Drawdowns

QARP vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QARP drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QARP and IUSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QARPIUSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.44%

-63.41%

+27.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

-13.07%

+5.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.65%

-22.28%

+6.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-32.21%

+9.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-1.05%

+0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.44%

-21.44%

+17.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

3.06%

-1.47%

Volatility

QARP vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) is 2.27%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that QARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QARPIUSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.27%

4.22%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.75%

12.23%

-4.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.38%

15.71%

-5.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.51%

20.86%

-5.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

20.40%

-0.75%

QARP vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QARP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QARP vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison

QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than IUSG's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.47%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.02%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QARP and IUSG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IUSG has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to QARP (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QARP dropped -35.44% vs IUSG's -63.41%.

On 5-year performance, IUSG leads with 15.67% vs 12.26% for QARP. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 15.67% return vs 12.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.

QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.47% for IUSG.

QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index, while IUSG tracks Russell 3000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for QARP and 0.04% for IUSG.

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QARP and IUSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer