QAI vs. WTIP
QAI (IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF) and WTIP (WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund) are both Long-Short funds. QAI is passively managed, while WTIP is actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QAI charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for WTIP.
Performance
QAI vs. WTIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QAI achieves a 9.46% return, which is significantly lower than WTIP's 15.11% return.
QAI
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 9.46%
- 6M
- 10.26%
- 1Y
- 16.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.76%
- 10Y*
- 3.96%
WTIP
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 15.11%
- 6M
- 17.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QAI vs. WTIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 9.46% | 6.36% |
WTIP WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund | 15.11% | 14.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between QAI and WTIP is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QAI vs. WTIP — Risk / Return Rank
QAI
WTIP
QAI vs. WTIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund (WTIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QAI | WTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.86 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.06 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.57 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.90 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QAI | WTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.95 | -1.37 |
Drawdowns
QAI vs. WTIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QAI drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, which is greater than WTIP's maximum drawdown of -7.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAI and WTIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QAI | WTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.95% | -7.74% | -7.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.73% | +7.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -1.36% | -1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | — | — |
Volatility
QAI vs. WTIP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QAI | WTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.91% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.97% | 17.07% | -11.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.56% | 17.07% | -10.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.17% | 17.07% | -10.90% |
QAI vs. WTIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QAI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIP's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
QAI vs. WTIP - Dividend Comparison
QAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than WTIP's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 1.37% | 1.50% | 2.22% | 4.08% | 2.00% | 0.28% | 1.98% | 1.91% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.48% |
WTIP WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund | 2.78% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QAI and WTIP have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WTIP is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WTIP is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QAI.
WTIP has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 1.37% for QAI.
They also come from different issuers: New York Life and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QAI and 0.65% for WTIP.
Find the right allocation for QAI and WTIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer