WTIP vs. FFLS

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

WTIP (WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund) and FFLS (The Future Fund Long/Short ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, WTIP returned 25.03% vs -1.79% for FFLS. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WTIP charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for FFLS.

Performance

WTIP vs. FFLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund (WTIP) and The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTIP achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly higher than FFLS's -1.61% return.

WTIP

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -6.37%
• YTD: 9.21%
• 6M: 8.54%
• 1Y: 25.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFLS

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: -1.61%
• 6M: -1.34%
• 1Y: -1.79%
• 3Y*: 8.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTIP vs. FFLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WTIP WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund	9.21%	13.49%
FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF	-1.61%	-1.00%

Correlation

The correlation between WTIP and FFLS is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

WTIP vs. FFLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTIP

WTIP Risk / Return Rank: 44
WTIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
WTIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
WTIP Omega Ratio Rank: 50
WTIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
WTIP Martin Ratio Rank: 46

FFLS

FFLS Risk / Return Rank: 7
FFLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
FFLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FFLS Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FFLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
FFLS Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTIP vs. FFLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund (WTIP) and The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WTIP	FFLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	-0.19	+1.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	-0.20	+2.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	0.98	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	-0.16	+2.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.58	-0.34	+7.92

WTIP vs. FFLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the FFLS Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTIP and FFLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WTIP vs. FFLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIP drawdown since its inception was -12.46%, which is greater than FFLS's maximum drawdown of -11.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIP and FFLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTIP	FFLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.46%	-11.05%	-1.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.46%	-11.05%	-1.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.46%	-6.25%	-6.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.87%	-3.16%	+1.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	5.28%	-1.97%

Volatility

WTIP vs. FFLS - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund (WTIP) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) at 4.35%. This indicates that WTIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTIP	FFLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.81%	4.35%	+5.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.69%	7.88%	+7.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.95%	9.67%	+7.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.90%	11.40%	+5.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.90%	11.40%	+5.50%

WTIP vs. FFLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTIP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FFLS's 1.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTIP vs. FFLS - Dividend Comparison

WTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than FFLS's 6.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF	6.68%	6.58%	3.34%
WTIP WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund	2.93%	1.59%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTIP and FFLS in my portfolio?

WTIP and FFLS have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WTIP or FFLS?

WTIP has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to FFLS (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTIP dropped -12.46% vs FFLS's -11.05%.

Which ETF is better, WTIP or FFLS?

On 1-year performance, WTIP leads with 25.03% vs -1.79% for FFLS. On fees, WTIP is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FFLS has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WTIP or FFLS?

Over the 1-year period, WTIP has performed better with a 25.03% return vs -1.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTIP or FFLS?

WTIP is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for FFLS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTIP or FFLS?

FFLS has the higher dividend yield at 6.68%, compared with 2.93% for WTIP.

What is the main difference between WTIP and FFLS?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and The Future Fund. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for WTIP and 1.75% for FFLS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WTIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.