PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTIP vs. INFL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTIP vs. INFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund (WTIP) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTIP achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly lower than INFL's 11.53% return.


WTIP

1D
-0.35%
1M
-6.37%
YTD
9.21%
6M
8.54%
1Y
25.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

INFL

1D
-0.70%
1M
-7.06%
YTD
11.53%
6M
10.73%
1Y
18.83%
3Y*
20.29%
5Y*
12.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTIP vs. INFL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WTIP and INFL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTIP vs. INFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTIP
WTIP Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
WTIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIP Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIP Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

INFL
INFL Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
INFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFL Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
INFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFL Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTIP vs. INFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund (WTIP) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WTIPINFLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.21

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

1.87

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.58

5.39

+2.19

WTIP vs. INFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the INFL Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTIP and INFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WTIP vs. INFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIP drawdown since its inception was -12.46%, smaller than the maximum INFL drawdown of -21.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIP and INFL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTIPINFLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.46%

-21.30%

+8.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.46%

-10.09%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.46%

-10.09%

-2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-5.13%

+3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

3.50%

-0.19%

Volatility

WTIP vs. INFL - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund (WTIP) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) at 5.05%. This indicates that WTIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTIPINFLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.81%

5.05%

+4.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.69%

12.79%

+2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.95%

16.18%

+0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

17.77%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.90%

17.68%

-0.78%

WTIP vs. INFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTIP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than INFL's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTIP vs. INFL - Dividend Comparison

WTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than INFL's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
INFL
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF
0.95%1.26%1.77%1.60%1.65%0.91%
WTIP
WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund
2.93%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTIP and INFL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WTIP has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to INFL (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTIP dropped -12.46% vs INFL's -21.30%.

On 1-year performance, WTIP leads with 25.03% vs 18.83% for INFL. On fees, WTIP is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, INFL has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WTIP has performed better with a 25.03% return vs 18.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTIP is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INFL.

WTIP has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 0.95% for INFL.

WTIP is categorized as Long-Short, while INFL is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Horizon Kinetics LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for WTIP and 0.85% for INFL.

WTIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTIP and INFL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer