QAI vs. IQSU
QAI (IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF) and IQSU (IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QAI is a Long-Short fund tracking the IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index, while IQSU is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IQ Candriam ESG US Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QAI returned 4.57%/yr vs 12.84%/yr for IQSU. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QAI charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IQSU.
Performance
QAI vs. IQSU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QAI achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly lower than IQSU's 13.06% return.
QAI
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 16.35%
- 3Y*
- 10.28%
- 5Y*
- 4.57%
- 10Y*
- 3.93%
IQSU
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- 13.06%
- 6M
- 13.30%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- —
QAI vs. IQSU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 9.07% | 8.29% | 6.67% | 10.07% | -8.68% | -0.16% | 5.73% | 0.31% |
IQSU IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF | 13.06% | 14.44% | 16.64% | 32.96% | -22.10% | 30.53% | 28.24% | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between QAI and IQSU is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019 | 0.74 |
The correlation between QAI and IQSU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
QAI vs. IQSU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QAI
IQSU
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Technology
QAI
IQSU
Financial Services
QAI
IQSU
Industrials
QAI
IQSU
Communication Services
QAI
IQSU
Consumer Cyclical
QAI
IQSU
Healthcare
QAI
IQSU
Basic Materials
QAI
IQSU
Utilities
QAI
IQSU
Energy
QAI
IQSU
Consumer Defensive
QAI
IQSU
Real Estate
QAI
IQSU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QAI vs. IQSU — Risk / Return Rank
QAI
IQSU
QAI vs. IQSU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QAI | IQSU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.74 | 2.13 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.91 | 2.91 | +1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.39 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.42 | 2.64 | +1.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.26 | 10.74 | +7.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QAI | IQSU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | 2.13 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.72 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.79 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
QAI vs. IQSU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QAI drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, smaller than the maximum IQSU drawdown of -31.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAI and IQSU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QAI | IQSU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.95% | -31.29% | +16.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.71% | -11.18% | +7.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.78% | -20.96% | +13.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.32% | -26.76% | +12.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -0.48% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -5.99% | +3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 2.74% | -1.84% |
Volatility
QAI vs. IQSU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) is 2.06%, while IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that QAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQSU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QAI | IQSU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.06% | 3.64% | -1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.91% | 9.83% | -4.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.99% | 13.85% | -7.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.55% | 17.88% | -11.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.17% | 20.68% | -14.51% |
QAI vs. IQSU - Expense Ratio Comparison
QAI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than IQSU's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
QAI vs. IQSU - Dividend Comparison
QAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than IQSU's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQSU IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF | 0.97% | 1.09% | 1.12% | 1.15% | 1.47% | 1.07% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 1.38% | 1.50% | 2.22% | 4.08% | 2.00% | 0.28% | 1.98% | 1.91% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QAI and IQSU have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IQSU has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to QAI (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QAI dropped -14.95% vs IQSU's -31.29%.
On 5-year performance, IQSU leads with 12.84% vs 4.57% for QAI. On fees, IQSU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, QAI has been the lower-risk option at 2.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IQSU has performed better with a 12.84% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IQSU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QAI.
QAI has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.97% for IQSU.
QAI is categorized as Long-Short, while IQSU is Large Cap Growth Equities. QAI tracks IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index, while IQSU tracks IQ Candriam ESG US Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QAI and 0.09% for IQSU.
QAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QAI and IQSU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer