QAI vs. FFLS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

QAI (NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF) and FFLS (Future Fund Long/Short ETF) are both Long-Short funds. QAI is passively managed, while FFLS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QAI returned 8.67%/yr vs 8.99%/yr for FFLS. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QAI charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for FFLS.

Performance

QAI vs. FFLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QAI achieves a 7.67% return, which is significantly higher than FFLS's -1.36% return.

QAI

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -0.72%
• 6M: 5.22%
• YTD: 7.67%
• 1Y: 12.58%
• 3Y*: 8.67%
• 5Y*: 4.39%
• 10Y*: 3.74%
• ALL TIME*: 3.49%

FFLS

• 1D: 2.13%
• 1M: -1.93%
• 6M: -2.39%
• YTD: -1.36%
• 1Y: -3.56%
• 3Y*: 8.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FFLS Future Fund Long/Short ETF	$154.37K	$125.96K	$156.23K
QAI NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF	$2.04M	$2.05M	$2.17M

QAI vs. FFLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QAI NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF	7.67%	8.29%	6.67%	5.55%
FFLS Future Fund Long/Short ETF	-1.36%	7.49%	17.71%	0.79%

Correlation

The correlation between QAI and FFLS is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2023	0.54

The correlation between QAI and FFLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QAI vs. FFLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QAI

QAI Risk / Return Rank: 83
QAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
QAI Omega Ratio Rank: 82
QAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
QAI Martin Ratio Rank: 84

FFLS

FFLS Risk / Return Rank: 6
FFLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FFLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FFLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5
FFLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
FFLS Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QAI vs. FFLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QAI	FFLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	-0.43	+2.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	-0.55	+3.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	0.94	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.39	-0.41	+3.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.62	-0.79	+12.40

QAI vs. FFLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the FFLS Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QAI and FFLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QAI vs. FFLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QAI drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, which is greater than FFLS's maximum drawdown of -11.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAI and FFLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	QAI	FFLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.95%	-11.05%	-3.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.71%	-11.05%	+7.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.78%	-11.05%	+3.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.90%	-6.00%	+4.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.56%	-3.27%	+0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.08%	5.67%	-4.59%

Volatility

QAI vs. FFLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) is 1.82%, while Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that QAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QAI	FFLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.82%	4.13%	-2.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.78%	8.76%	-2.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.85%	10.38%	-3.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.71%	11.47%	-4.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.24%	11.47%	-5.23%

QAI vs. FFLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QAI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFLS's 1.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

QAI vs. FFLS - Dividend Comparison

QAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than FFLS's 6.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFLS Future Fund Long/Short ETF	6.67%	6.58%	3.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QAI NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF	1.40%	1.50%	2.22%	4.08%	2.00%	0.28%	1.98%	1.91%	1.90%	0.00%	0.00%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QAI and FFLS in my portfolio?

QAI and FFLS have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QAI or FFLS?

FFLS has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to QAI (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QAI dropped -14.95% vs FFLS's -11.05%.

Which ETF is better, QAI or FFLS?

On 3-year performance, FFLS leads with 8.99% vs 8.67% for QAI. On fees, QAI is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QAI has been the lower-risk option at 1.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QAI or FFLS?

Over the 3-year period, FFLS has performed better with a 8.99% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QAI or FFLS?

QAI is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for FFLS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QAI or FFLS?

FFLS has the higher dividend yield at 6.67%, compared with 1.40% for QAI.

What is the main difference between QAI and FFLS?

They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Future Fund. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QAI and 1.75% for FFLS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.