FFLS vs. VT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FFLS (The Future Fund Long/Short ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFLS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by The Future Fund, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. FFLS is actively managed, while VT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FFLS returned 8.51%/yr vs 20.75%/yr for VT. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFLS charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

FFLS vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLS achieves a -1.61% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 12.36% return.

FFLS

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: -1.61%
• 6M: -1.34%
• 1Y: -1.79%
• 3Y*: 8.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VT

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.64%
• YTD: 12.36%
• 6M: 12.14%
• 1Y: 29.57%
• 3Y*: 20.75%
• 5Y*: 11.13%
• 10Y*: 13.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFLS vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF	-1.61%	7.49%	17.71%	0.79%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	12.36%	22.43%	16.49%	8.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FFLS and VT is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2023	0.64

The correlation between FFLS and VT shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FFLS vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFLS	VT
Technology	17.7%	31.1%
Industrials	14.8%	11.4%
Healthcare	10.2%	7.9%
Communication Services	6.4%	8.0%
Energy	4.8%	3.8%
Real Estate	2.6%	2.3%
Consumer Cyclical	2.3%	9.3%
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	4.5%
Basic Materials	-	4.1%
Utilities	-	2.4%
Financial Services	-7.7%	15.2%

Return for Risk

FFLS vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLS

FFLS Risk / Return Rank: 7
FFLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
FFLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FFLS Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FFLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
FFLS Martin Ratio Rank: 7

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 70
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 71
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLS vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFLS	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.19	2.21	-2.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.20	3.03	-3.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.40	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.16	3.07	-3.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.34	13.35	-13.69

FFLS vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLS Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLS and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFLS vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLS drawdown since its inception was -11.05%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLS and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFLS	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.05%	-50.27%	+39.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.05%	-9.67%	-1.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.05%	-16.51%	+5.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.38%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.25%	-0.77%	-5.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.16%	-7.00%	+3.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.28%	2.22%	+3.06%

Volatility

FFLS vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) is 4.35%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that FFLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFLS	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.35%	5.23%	-0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.88%	11.12%	-3.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.67%	13.44%	-3.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.40%	16.16%	-4.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.40%	17.27%	-5.87%

FFLS vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLS has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFLS vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

FFLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, more than VT's 1.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF	6.68%	6.58%	3.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.58%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFLS and VT in my portfolio?

FFLS and VT have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFLS or VT?

VT has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to FFLS (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLS dropped -11.05% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which ETF is better, FFLS or VT?

On 3-year performance, VT leads with 20.75% vs 8.51% for FFLS. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, FFLS has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFLS or VT?

Over the 3-year period, VT has performed better with a 20.75% return vs 8.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFLS or VT?

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for FFLS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFLS or VT?

FFLS has the higher dividend yield at 6.68%, compared with 1.58% for VT.

What is the main difference between FFLS and VT?

FFLS is categorized as Long-Short, while VT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: The Future Fund and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for FFLS and 0.06% for VT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.