PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QAI vs. EMPB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QAI vs. EMPB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QAI vs. EMPB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QAI
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
1.82%8.29%-1.42%
EMPB
Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF
1.31%14.84%0.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QAI achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than EMPB's 1.31% return.


QAI

1D
1.25%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
1.82%
6M
2.98%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
8.05%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*
3.30%

EMPB

1D
2.72%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
1.31%
6M
-0.11%
1Y
16.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QAI vs. EMPB - Expense Ratio Comparison

QAI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EMPB's 1.82% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QAI vs. EMPB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QAI
QAI Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAI Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAI Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

EMPB
EMPB Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EMPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMPB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EMPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMPB Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QAI vs. EMPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QAIEMPBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.41

1.37

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.99

2.03

-0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.26

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.76

-0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.93

8.07

+0.86

QAI vs. EMPB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the EMPB Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QAI and EMPB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QAIEMPBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

1.37

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

1.09

-0.58

Correlation

The correlation between QAI and EMPB is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QAI vs. EMPB - Dividend Comparison

QAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than EMPB's 0.87% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QAI
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
1.48%1.50%2.22%4.08%2.00%0.28%1.98%1.91%1.90%0.00%0.00%0.48%
EMPB
Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF
0.87%0.88%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QAI vs. EMPB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QAI drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, which is greater than EMPB's maximum drawdown of -7.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAI and EMPB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QAIEMPBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.95%

-7.55%

-7.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.43%

-5.98%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-2.99%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.60%

-1.64%

-0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

2.04%

-0.87%

Volatility

QAI vs. EMPB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) is 2.83%, while Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that QAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QAIEMPBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

5.97%

-3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.95%

9.49%

-4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.55%

12.21%

-4.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.51%

12.26%

-5.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.12%

12.26%

-6.14%