QAI vs. CSM
Compare and contrast key facts about IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM).
QAI and CSM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QAI is a passively managed fund by New York Life that tracks the performance of the IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009. CSM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Credit Suisse 130/30 Large-Cap Index. It was launched on Jul 13, 2009. Both QAI and CSM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QAI vs. CSM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QAI vs. CSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 1.82% | 8.29% | 6.67% | 10.07% | -8.68% | -0.16% | 5.73% | 8.68% | -3.32% | 6.17% |
CSM Proshares Large Cap Core Plus | -5.83% | 21.84% | 22.09% | 23.50% | -18.27% | 33.13% | 10.94% | 29.26% | -7.88% | 22.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QAI achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than CSM's -5.83% return. Over the past 10 years, QAI has underperformed CSM with an annualized return of 3.30%, while CSM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.84% annualized return.
QAI
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 2.98%
- 1Y
- 10.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.40%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
CSM
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- -5.83%
- 6M
- -1.69%
- 1Y
- 18.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QAI vs. CSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
QAI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CSM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QAI vs. CSM — Risk / Return Rank
QAI
CSM
QAI vs. CSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QAI | CSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | 0.99 | +0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 1.53 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.23 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 1.49 | +0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.93 | 6.81 | +2.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QAI | CSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 0.99 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.67 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.70 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.81 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between QAI and CSM is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QAI vs. CSM - Dividend Comparison
QAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than CSM's 1.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 1.48% | 1.50% | 2.22% | 4.08% | 2.00% | 0.28% | 1.98% | 1.91% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.48% |
CSM Proshares Large Cap Core Plus | 1.16% | 1.04% | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 0.78% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 1.54% | 1.28% | 1.49% | 1.67% |
Drawdowns
QAI vs. CSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QAI drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, smaller than the maximum CSM drawdown of -36.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAI and CSM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QAI | CSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.95% | -36.11% | +21.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.43% | -12.92% | +7.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.32% | -23.82% | +9.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.95% | -36.11% | +21.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -7.17% | +4.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -4.07% | +1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 2.82% | -1.65% |
Volatility
QAI vs. CSM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) is 2.83%, while Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that QAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QAI | CSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 4.79% | -1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.95% | 9.49% | -4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.55% | 18.97% | -11.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.51% | 17.12% | -10.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 18.37% | -12.25% |