PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QAI vs. CBLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QAI vs. CBLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QAI achieves a 9.46% return, which is significantly lower than CBLS's 24.17% return.


QAI

1D
0.30%
1M
2.80%
YTD
9.46%
6M
10.26%
1Y
16.98%
3Y*
10.41%
5Y*
4.76%
10Y*
3.96%

CBLS

1D
3.27%
1M
9.60%
YTD
24.17%
6M
23.40%
1Y
20.95%
3Y*
19.86%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QAI vs. CBLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QAI
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
9.46%8.29%6.67%10.07%-8.68%-0.16%3.02%
CBLS
Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF
24.17%5.87%28.74%-2.67%-11.64%2.85%14.15%

Correlation

The correlation between QAI and CBLS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2020

0.60

The correlation between QAI and CBLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

QAI vs. CBLS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QAI
CBLS

Technology

21.9%
32.3%

Financial Services

19.5%
-6.8%

Industrials

13.6%
3.8%

Communication Services

11.2%
-2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
0.4%

Healthcare

7.1%
9.2%

Basic Materials

5.3%
7.5%

Utilities

3.8%
7.5%

Energy

3.7%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
-3.8%

Real Estate

2.9%
-2.4%

Technology

QAI
21.9%
CBLS
32.3%

Financial Services

QAI
19.5%
CBLS
-6.8%

Industrials

QAI
13.6%
CBLS
3.8%

Communication Services

QAI
11.2%
CBLS
-2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

QAI
7.3%
CBLS
0.4%

Healthcare

QAI
7.1%
CBLS
9.2%

Basic Materials

QAI
5.3%
CBLS
7.5%

Utilities

QAI
3.8%
CBLS
7.5%

Energy

QAI
3.7%
CBLS
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

QAI
3.7%
CBLS
-3.8%

Real Estate

QAI
2.9%
CBLS
-2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QAI vs. CBLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QAI
QAI Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
QAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAI Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
QAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAI Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

CBLS
CBLS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CBLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBLS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
CBLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QAI vs. CBLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QAICBLSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.86

1.38

+1.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.06

1.94

+2.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.25

+0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.57

2.71

+1.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.90

6.61

+12.29

QAI vs. CBLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QAI Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the CBLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QAI and CBLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QAICBLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

1.38

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.37

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.63

-0.06

Drawdowns

QAI vs. CBLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QAI drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, smaller than the maximum CBLS drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAI and CBLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QAICBLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.95%

-32.78%

+17.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.71%

-8.15%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.78%

-15.27%

+7.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.32%

-31.24%

+16.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-12.80%

+10.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

3.34%

-2.44%

Volatility

QAI vs. CBLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) is 2.01%, while Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) has a volatility of 7.08%. This indicates that QAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QAICBLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.01%

7.08%

-5.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.91%

12.62%

-7.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.97%

15.29%

-9.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.56%

15.64%

-9.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.17%

16.13%

-9.96%

QAI vs. CBLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QAI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than CBLS's 1.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

QAI vs. CBLS - Dividend Comparison

QAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than CBLS's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBLS
Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF
0.72%0.90%0.73%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QAI
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
1.37%1.50%2.22%4.08%2.00%0.28%1.98%1.91%1.90%0.00%0.00%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


QAI and CBLS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBLS has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to QAI (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QAI dropped -14.95% vs CBLS's -32.78%.

On 5-year performance, CBLS leads with 5.73% vs 4.76% for QAI. On fees, QAI is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QAI has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CBLS has performed better with a 5.73% return vs 4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QAI is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.95% for CBLS.

QAI has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.72% for CBLS.

They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Changebridge Capital LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QAI and 1.95% for CBLS.

QAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QAI and CBLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer