PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBLS vs. CLSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CBLS vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CBLS vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CBLS
Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF
4.37%5.87%28.74%-2.67%-6.56%
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
2.96%20.44%35.54%17.54%-3.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBLS achieves a 4.37% return, which is significantly higher than CLSE's 2.96% return.


CBLS

1D
0.08%
1M
-6.21%
YTD
4.37%
6M
0.72%
1Y
10.78%
3Y*
11.82%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*

CLSE

1D
2.44%
1M
-1.02%
YTD
2.96%
6M
9.11%
1Y
31.47%
3Y*
24.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CBLS vs. CLSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBLS has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CLSE's 1.56% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CBLS vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBLS
CBLS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CBLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBLS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CBLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBLS Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

CLSE
CLSE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBLS vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBLSCLSEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

2.19

-1.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

2.84

-1.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.40

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

4.14

-2.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.27

19.56

-16.29

CBLS vs. CLSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBLS Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the CLSE Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBLS and CLSE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBLSCLSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

2.19

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

1.25

-0.81

Correlation

The correlation between CBLS and CLSE is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CBLS vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison

CBLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than CLSE's 0.92% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
CBLS
Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF
0.86%0.90%0.73%0.44%0.00%
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
0.92%0.95%0.93%1.21%0.85%

Drawdowns

CBLS vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBLS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, which is greater than CLSE's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBLS and CLSE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CBLSCLSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.78%

-16.45%

-16.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-7.88%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.05%

-2.53%

-4.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.14%

-3.73%

-9.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

1.67%

+1.59%

Volatility

CBLS vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison

Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) have volatilities of 5.40% and 5.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CBLSCLSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

5.68%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

10.35%

+0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.24%

14.47%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

13.85%

+1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.89%

13.85%

+2.04%