PYZ vs. WOOD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PYZ (Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF) and WOOD (iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PYZ is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Technical Leaders Index, while WOOD is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PYZ returned 10.27%/yr vs 5.22%/yr for WOOD. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PYZ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for WOOD.

Performance

PYZ vs. WOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) and iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYZ achieves a 19.31% return, which is significantly higher than WOOD's -6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, PYZ has outperformed WOOD with an annualized return of 10.27%, while WOOD has yielded a comparatively lower 5.22% annualized return.

PYZ

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 1.05%
• YTD: 19.31%
• 6M: 22.21%
• 1Y: 44.91%
• 3Y*: 18.92%
• 5Y*: 8.03%
• 10Y*: 10.27%

WOOD

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -1.34%
• YTD: -6.42%
• 6M: -3.33%
• 1Y: -6.64%
• 3Y*: 0.02%
• 5Y*: -3.82%
• 10Y*: 5.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYZ vs. WOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PYZ Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF	19.31%	28.01%	2.54%	9.56%	-15.45%	32.68%	15.39%	20.66%	-24.33%	20.01%
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF	-6.42%	-3.27%	-4.21%	13.84%	-19.39%	17.03%	20.36%	19.75%	-17.73%	34.49%

Correlation

The correlation between PYZ and WOOD is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008	0.74

The correlation between PYZ and WOOD shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PYZ vs. WOOD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PYZ	WOOD
Basic Materials	86.3%	63.6%
Industrials	13.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.2%	23.5%
Energy	3.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.6%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	12.9%
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PYZ vs. WOOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYZ

PYZ Risk / Return Rank: 50
PYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
PYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
PYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 48
PYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
PYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 50

WOOD

WOOD Risk / Return Rank: 6
WOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
WOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
WOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 6
WOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
WOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYZ vs. WOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) and iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PYZ	WOOD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	-0.36	+2.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	-0.39	+2.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	0.96	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	-0.31	+2.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.38	-0.71	+9.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PYZ vs. WOOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the WOOD Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYZ and WOOD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PYZ	WOOD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.77	-0.36	+2.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	-0.19	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	0.24	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.15	+0.22

Drawdowns

PYZ vs. WOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYZ drawdown since its inception was -65.15%, roughly equal to the maximum WOOD drawdown of -63.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYZ and WOOD.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYZ	WOOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.15%	-63.25%	-1.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.75%	-21.64%	+3.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.74%	-22.79%	-3.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.97%	-30.71%	-2.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.46%	-50.20%	-2.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.68%	-23.87%	+22.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.64%	-14.76%	+2.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.37%	9.34%	-3.97%

Volatility

PYZ vs. WOOD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) at 5.61%. This indicates that PYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYZ	WOOD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.44%	5.61%	+1.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.12%	13.97%	+6.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.52%	18.70%	+6.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.70%	19.72%	+5.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.43%	21.86%	+4.57%

PYZ vs. WOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYZ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than WOOD's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

PYZ vs. WOOD - Dividend Comparison

PYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than WOOD's 2.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PYZ Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF	0.52%	0.72%	1.13%	1.19%	1.18%	0.33%	1.04%	1.38%	1.20%	0.53%	1.07%	1.25%
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF	2.68%	2.51%	2.09%	1.64%	2.26%	1.24%	0.98%	1.85%	2.82%	1.19%	1.65%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PYZ and WOOD in my portfolio?

PYZ and WOOD have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PYZ or WOOD?

PYZ has higher volatility (7.44%) compared to WOOD (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYZ dropped -65.15% vs WOOD's -63.25%.

Which ETF is better, PYZ or WOOD?

On 10-year performance, PYZ leads with 10.27% vs 5.22% for WOOD. On fees, WOOD is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, WOOD has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PYZ or WOOD?

Over the 10-year period, PYZ has performed better with a 10.27% return vs 5.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PYZ or WOOD?

WOOD is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PYZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PYZ or WOOD?

WOOD has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 0.52% for PYZ.

What is the main difference between PYZ and WOOD?

PYZ is categorized as Momentum, while WOOD is Materials. PYZ tracks Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Technical Leaders Index, while WOOD tracks S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PYZ and 0.46% for WOOD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PYZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.