PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYTRX vs. BIMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYTRX vs. BIMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Fixed Income Absolute Return Fund (PYTRX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYTRX achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly lower than BIMSX's -0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, PYTRX has outperformed BIMSX with an annualized return of 2.44%, while BIMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.95% annualized return.


PYTRX

1D
-0.24%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
-0.15%
6M
-0.01%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
4.01%
5Y*
0.98%
10Y*
2.44%

BIMSX

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
-0.01%
6M
0.26%
1Y
3.53%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*
1.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYTRX vs. BIMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYTRX
Putnam Fixed Income Absolute Return Fund
-0.15%6.98%1.81%4.35%-2.17%-4.78%0.83%8.90%-0.01%5.53%
BIMSX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund
-0.01%6.76%3.21%5.53%-8.88%-1.68%7.16%6.83%0.30%2.53%

Correlation

The correlation between PYTRX and BIMSX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.21

Over the past year, PYTRX and BIMSX have become more correlated (0.90) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYTRX vs. BIMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYTRX
PYTRX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PYTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
PYTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

BIMSX
BIMSX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BIMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BIMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYTRX vs. BIMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Fixed Income Absolute Return Fund (PYTRX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYTRXBIMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

2.10

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.78

6.48

-1.70

PYTRX vs. BIMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYTRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the BIMSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYTRX and BIMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYTRXBIMSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.55

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.27

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.60

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

1.09

-0.51

Drawdowns

PYTRX vs. BIMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYTRX drawdown since its inception was -12.75%, roughly equal to the maximum BIMSX drawdown of -13.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYTRX and BIMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYTRXBIMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.75%

-13.07%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-1.87%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.07%

-2.57%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.85%

-13.00%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.75%

-13.07%

+0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.04%

-1.16%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-1.59%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.60%

+0.44%

Volatility

PYTRX vs. BIMSX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Fixed Income Absolute Return Fund (PYTRX) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) at 0.85%. This indicates that PYTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYTRXBIMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

0.85%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.82%

1.79%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83%

2.54%

+1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.86%

3.88%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.01%

3.24%

+0.77%

PYTRX vs. BIMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYTRX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than BIMSX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYTRX vs. BIMSX - Dividend Comparison

PYTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than BIMSX's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIMSX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund
3.60%3.50%3.44%2.81%1.81%1.90%3.08%2.16%2.14%1.98%1.89%2.21%
PYTRX
Putnam Fixed Income Absolute Return Fund
4.02%4.02%4.31%4.43%4.38%3.67%3.44%4.02%2.49%4.76%3.40%4.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, PYTRX and BIMSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PYTRX has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to BIMSX (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYTRX dropped -12.75% vs BIMSX's -13.07%.

BIMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYTRX and BIMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer