PYPL vs. QQ.L
PYPL (PayPal Holdings, Inc.) and QQ.L (QinetiQ Group plc) are both stocks. PYPL operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while QQ.L operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, PYPL returned 1.21%/yr vs 9.23%/yr for QQ.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PYPL vs. QQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PYPL is traded in USD, while QQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the QQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYPL achieves a -28.41% return, which is significantly lower than QQ.L's 7.41% return. Over the past 10 years, PYPL has underperformed QQ.L with an annualized return of 1.21%, while QQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.23% annualized return.
PYPL
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -7.88%
- YTD
- -28.41%
- 6M
- -32.22%
- 1Y
- -44.01%
- 3Y*
- -12.98%
- 5Y*
- -31.18%
- 10Y*
- 1.21%
QQ.L
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- 14.75%
- YTD
- 7.41%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- -6.03%
- 3Y*
- 13.28%
- 5Y*
- 7.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
PYPL vs. QQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | -28.41% | -31.44% | 38.98% | -13.77% | -62.23% | -19.48% | 116.51% | 28.64% | 14.22% | 86.52% |
QQ.L QinetiQ Group plc | 7.41% | 16.51% | 34.93% | -6.83% | 22.49% | -15.85% | -5.88% | 32.93% | 19.94% | -1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYPL and QQ.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2015 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
PYPL:
$38.21B
QQ.L:
£2.47B
PYPL:
$5.31
QQ.L:
-£0.14
PYPL:
1.17
QQ.L:
0.67
PYPL:
1.91
QQ.L:
4.47
PYPL:
$33.73B
QQ.L:
£3.85B
PYPL:
$15.56B
QQ.L:
£372.10M
PYPL:
$7.23B
QQ.L:
£533.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYPL vs. QQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
PYPL
QQ.L
PYPL vs. QQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) and QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PYPL | QQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 0.99 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | -0.22 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | -0.46 | -1.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PYPL vs. QQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYPL drawdown since its inception was -87.30%, which is greater than QQ.L's maximum drawdown of -61.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPL and QQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYPL | QQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.30% | -61.16% | -26.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.92% | -27.17% | -22.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.34% | -32.62% | -24.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.30% | -33.81% | -53.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.30% | -43.00% | -44.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.42% | -16.76% | -69.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.90% | -20.64% | -15.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.60% | 13.21% | +15.39% |
Volatility
PYPL vs. QQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) is 7.01%, while QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) has a volatility of 11.53%. This indicates that PYPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYPL | QQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 11.53% | -4.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.72% | 23.14% | +8.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.10% | 31.96% | +7.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.08% | 32.45% | +9.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.77% | 31.01% | +7.76% |
Dividends
PYPL vs. QQ.L - Dividend Comparison
PYPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than QQ.L's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 1.01% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQ.L QinetiQ Group plc | 1.91% | 2.00% | 1.99% | 2.49% | 2.04% | 2.59% | 2.06% | 1.84% | 2.20% | 2.60% | 2.17% | 1.99% |
Financials
PYPL vs. QQ.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PayPal Holdings, Inc. and QinetiQ Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PYPL vs. QQ.L - Profitability Comparison
PYPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.81B and revenue of 8.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.6%.
QQ.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported a gross profit of 110.20M and revenue of 1.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
PYPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.49B and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.
QQ.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported an operating income of 110.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.8%.
PYPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 1.11B and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
QQ.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported a net income of 69.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PYPL and QQ.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PYPL and QQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer