PYLD vs. MFUS
PYLD (PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PYLD is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO, while MFUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. PYLD is actively managed, while MFUS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PYLD returned 8.06%/yr vs 21.88%/yr for MFUS. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PYLD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.
Performance
PYLD vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYLD achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 17.10% return.
PYLD
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- 6.83%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFUS
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- 17.10%
- 6M
- 16.30%
- 1Y
- 27.79%
- 3Y*
- 21.88%
- 5Y*
- 13.08%
- 10Y*
- —
PYLD vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PYLD PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 1.41% | 9.57% | 7.69% | 5.46% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 17.10% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 10.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYLD and MFUS is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023 | 0.35 |
The correlation between PYLD and MFUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYLD vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank
PYLD
MFUS
PYLD vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PYLD | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.45 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 4.37 | -2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.56 | 17.76 | -8.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PYLD vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYLD drawdown since its inception was -4.52%, smaller than the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYLD and MFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYLD | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -35.21% | +30.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.25% | -6.39% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.52% | -15.39% | +10.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -1.05% | +0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -3.98% | +3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 1.57% | -0.85% |
Volatility
PYLD vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) is 1.07%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that PYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYLD | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 4.27% | -3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.62% | 8.91% | -6.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.08% | 11.25% | -8.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 15.09% | -11.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 17.35% | -13.36% |
PYLD vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYLD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
PYLD vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison
PYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than MFUS's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
PYLD PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 6.27% | 6.21% | 6.40% | 2.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PYLD and MFUS have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFUS has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to PYLD (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYLD dropped -4.52% vs MFUS's -35.21%.
On 3-year performance, MFUS leads with 21.88% vs 8.06% for PYLD. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, PYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 21.88% return vs 8.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PYLD.
PYLD has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 1.35% for MFUS.
PYLD is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while MFUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PYLD and 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PYLD and MFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer