PY vs. USMC
PY (Principal Value ETF) and USMC (Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Principal, while USMC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Mega Cap Select Leaders Index. PY is actively managed, while USMC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PY returned 7.32%/yr vs 15.40%/yr for USMC. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for USMC.
Performance
PY vs. USMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PY achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than USMC's 8.73% return.
PY
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 4.52%
- 1Y
- 14.24%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
USMC
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 8.73%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- 23.60%
- 3Y*
- 21.98%
- 5Y*
- 15.40%
- 10Y*
- —
PY vs. USMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PY Principal Value ETF | 4.14% | 7.74% | 16.79% | 9.11% | -5.10% | 34.83% | 2.71% | 26.87% | -13.34% | 7.81% |
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF | 8.73% | 14.99% | 29.82% | 31.57% | -17.17% | 26.30% | 16.05% | 27.37% | -2.30% | 5.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between PY and USMC is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2017 | 0.58 |
The correlation between PY and USMC shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PY vs. USMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PY
USMC
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
PY
USMC
Financial Services
PY
USMC
Healthcare
PY
USMC
Consumer Defensive
PY
USMC
Consumer Cyclical
PY
USMC
Industrials
PY
USMC
Energy
PY
USMC
Communication Services
PY
USMC
Utilities
PY
USMC
-
Basic Materials
PY
USMC
-
Real Estate
PY
USMC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PY vs. USMC — Risk / Return Rank
PY
USMC
PY vs. USMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Value ETF (PY) and Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PY | USMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.35 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 2.30 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.73 | 8.80 | -1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PY | USMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 2.01 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.95 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.84 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
PY vs. USMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PY drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than USMC's maximum drawdown of -29.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PY and USMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PY | USMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.44% | -29.97% | -15.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.20% | -10.30% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.84% | -19.12% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.84% | -24.09% | +6.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -0.35% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -4.40% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 2.69% | -0.84% |
Volatility
PY vs. USMC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal Value ETF (PY) is 2.28%, while Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) has a volatility of 2.52%. This indicates that PY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PY | USMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.28% | 2.52% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.28% | 8.68% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.53% | 11.81% | -1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 16.36% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 18.25% | +1.82% |
PY vs. USMC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than USMC's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PY vs. USMC - Dividend Comparison
PY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than USMC's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PY Principal Value ETF | 2.13% | 2.14% | 2.22% | 2.68% | 3.02% | 2.83% | 2.95% | 2.25% | 2.34% | 1.68% | 1.85% |
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF | 0.74% | 0.79% | 1.04% | 1.35% | 1.78% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 2.01% | 2.28% | 0.24% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PY and USMC have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USMC has higher volatility (2.52%) compared to PY (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PY dropped -45.44% vs USMC's -29.97%.
On 5-year performance, USMC leads with 15.40% vs 7.32% for PY. On fees, USMC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, PY has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USMC has performed better with a 15.40% return vs 7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for PY.
PY has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.74% for USMC.
PY is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while USMC is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PY and 0.12% for USMC.
USMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PY and USMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer