PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PY vs. PSET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PY vs. PSET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Value ETF (PY) and Principal Quality ETF (PSET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PY achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly higher than PSET's -0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, PY has underperformed PSET with an annualized return of 10.73%, while PSET has yielded a comparatively higher 12.73% annualized return.


PY

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.70%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.52%
1Y
14.24%
3Y*
13.22%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
10.73%

PSET

1D
-0.77%
1M
2.67%
YTD
-0.49%
6M
-0.66%
1Y
7.57%
3Y*
12.93%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
12.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PY vs. PSET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PY
Principal Value ETF
4.14%7.74%16.79%9.11%-5.10%34.83%2.71%26.87%-13.34%18.87%
PSET
Principal Quality ETF
-0.49%7.27%17.65%24.07%-16.52%29.59%16.20%34.85%-2.29%24.63%

Correlation

The correlation between PY and PSET is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016

0.58

The correlation between PY and PSET shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PY vs. PSET - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PY
PSET

Technology

25.0%
37.9%

Financial Services

16.5%
14.3%

Healthcare

12.0%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

11.5%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
5.4%

Industrials

9.3%
19.1%

Energy

5.6%
1.4%

Communication Services

5.1%
6.7%

Utilities

1.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.2%
3.3%

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Technology

PY
25.0%
PSET
37.9%

Financial Services

PY
16.5%
PSET
14.3%

Healthcare

PY
12.0%
PSET
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

PY
11.5%
PSET
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PY
11.0%
PSET
5.4%

Industrials

PY
9.3%
PSET
19.1%

Energy

PY
5.6%
PSET
1.4%

Communication Services

PY
5.1%
PSET
6.7%

Utilities

PY
1.7%
PSET

-

Basic Materials

PY
1.2%
PSET
3.3%

Real Estate

PY
1.1%
PSET

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PY vs. PSET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PY
PY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PY Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PY Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

PSET
PSET Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PSET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSET Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSET Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PSET Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSET Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PY vs. PSET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Value ETF (PY) and Principal Quality ETF (PSET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYPSETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.11

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

0.59

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.73

1.98

+5.75

PY vs. PSET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PY Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the PSET Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PY and PSET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYPSETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

0.60

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.51

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.71

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.71

-0.18

Drawdowns

PY vs. PSET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PY drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than PSET's maximum drawdown of -34.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PY and PSET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYPSETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.44%

-34.74%

-10.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.20%

-12.94%

+6.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.84%

-21.96%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.84%

-25.61%

+7.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.44%

-34.74%

-10.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-2.59%

+1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-4.59%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

3.82%

-1.97%

Volatility

PY vs. PSET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Value ETF (PY) is 2.28%, while Principal Quality ETF (PSET) has a volatility of 3.01%. This indicates that PY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYPSETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

3.01%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.28%

9.67%

-2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.53%

12.67%

-2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.77%

17.51%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.07%

18.06%

+2.01%

PY vs. PSET - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PY and PSET have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PY vs. PSET - Dividend Comparison

PY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than PSET's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PSET
Principal Quality ETF
0.63%0.59%0.69%0.85%1.47%0.89%1.09%1.52%1.33%1.02%1.26%
PY
Principal Value ETF
2.13%2.14%2.22%2.68%3.02%2.83%2.95%2.25%2.34%1.68%1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


PY and PSET have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSET has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to PY (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PY dropped -45.44% vs PSET's -34.74%.

On 10-year performance, PSET leads with 12.73% vs 10.73% for PY. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, PY has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PSET has performed better with a 12.73% return vs 10.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PY and PSET have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

PY has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.63% for PSET.

PY is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while PSET is Large Cap Growth Equities.

PY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PY and PSET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer