PY vs. PSC
PY (Principal Value ETF) and PSC (Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Principal, while PSC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Small Cap Select Leaders TR Index. PY is actively managed, while PSC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PY returned 7.32%/yr vs 8.06%/yr for PSC. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for PSC.
Performance
PY vs. PSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PY achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than PSC's 13.84% return.
PY
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 4.52%
- 1Y
- 14.24%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
PSC
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- YTD
- 13.84%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 27.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- —
PY vs. PSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PY Principal Value ETF | 4.14% | 7.74% | 16.79% | 9.11% | -5.10% | 34.83% | 2.71% | 26.87% | -13.34% | 18.87% |
PSC Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF | 13.84% | 13.41% | 12.38% | 18.51% | -15.91% | 32.56% | 13.30% | 18.99% | -11.35% | 15.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between PY and PSC is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016 | 0.68 |
The correlation between PY and PSC shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PY vs. PSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PY
PSC
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
PY
PSC
Financial Services
PY
PSC
Healthcare
PY
PSC
Consumer Defensive
PY
PSC
Consumer Cyclical
PY
PSC
Industrials
PY
PSC
Energy
PY
PSC
Communication Services
PY
PSC
Utilities
PY
PSC
Basic Materials
PY
PSC
Real Estate
PY
PSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PY vs. PSC — Risk / Return Rank
PY
PSC
PY vs. PSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Value ETF (PY) and Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PY | PSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.25 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 2.74 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.73 | 9.55 | -1.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PY | PSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 1.46 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.39 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.50 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
PY vs. PSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PY drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, roughly equal to the maximum PSC drawdown of -46.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PY and PSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PY | PSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.44% | -46.69% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.20% | -9.95% | +3.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.84% | -23.49% | +5.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.84% | -25.86% | +8.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -0.94% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -8.28% | +3.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 2.85% | -1.00% |
Volatility
PY vs. PSC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal Value ETF (PY) is 2.28%, while Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that PY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PY | PSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.28% | 4.93% | -2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.28% | 12.77% | -5.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.53% | 18.65% | -8.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 20.99% | -5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 23.30% | -3.23% |
PY vs. PSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PSC's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
PY vs. PSC - Dividend Comparison
PY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than PSC's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSC Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF | 0.58% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.73% | 1.92% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 1.47% | 1.30% | 0.95% | 0.35% |
PY Principal Value ETF | 2.13% | 2.14% | 2.22% | 2.68% | 3.02% | 2.83% | 2.95% | 2.25% | 2.34% | 1.68% | 1.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PY and PSC have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSC has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to PY (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PY dropped -45.44% vs PSC's -46.69%.
On 5-year performance, PSC leads with 8.06% vs 7.32% for PY. On fees, PY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PY has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PSC has performed better with a 8.06% return vs 7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for PSC.
PY has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.58% for PSC.
PY is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while PSC is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PY and 0.38% for PSC.
PSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PY and PSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer