PSC vs. VIOV
PSC (Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF) and VIOV (Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Small Cap Select Leaders TR Index, while VIOV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSC returned 8.77%/yr vs 6.32%/yr for VIOV. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSC charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VIOV.
Performance
PSC vs. VIOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PSC having a 17.73% return and VIOV slightly lower at 17.53%.
PSC
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 17.73%
- 6M
- 15.20%
- 1Y
- 31.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- —
VIOV
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 17.53%
- 6M
- 15.94%
- 1Y
- 37.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
PSC vs. VIOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSC Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF | 17.73% | 13.41% | 12.38% | 18.51% | -15.91% | 32.56% | 13.30% | 18.99% | -11.35% | 15.93% |
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 17.53% | 6.63% | 7.44% | 15.36% | -11.37% | 30.67% | 2.81% | 24.44% | -12.85% | 11.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSC and VIOV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.84 |
The correlation between PSC and VIOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSC vs. VIOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSC
VIOV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Technology
PSC
VIOV
Financial Services
PSC
VIOV
Industrials
PSC
VIOV
Healthcare
PSC
VIOV
Consumer Cyclical
PSC
VIOV
Energy
PSC
VIOV
Real Estate
PSC
VIOV
Basic Materials
PSC
VIOV
Utilities
PSC
VIOV
Communication Services
PSC
VIOV
Consumer Defensive
PSC
VIOV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSC vs. VIOV — Risk / Return Rank
PSC
VIOV
PSC vs. VIOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSC | VIOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 4.07 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.15 | 13.34 | -2.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSC vs. VIOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSC drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, roughly equal to the maximum VIOV drawdown of -47.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSC and VIOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSC | VIOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.69% | -47.36% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -9.33% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.49% | -28.44% | +4.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.86% | -28.44% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -1.58% | +1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.23% | -7.36% | -0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 2.84% | +0.01% |
Volatility
PSC vs. VIOV - Volatility Comparison
Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) at 4.75%. This indicates that PSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSC | VIOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 4.75% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.32% | 11.82% | +1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.96% | 18.44% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 21.90% | -0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.28% | 23.88% | -0.60% |
PSC vs. VIOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VIOV's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSC vs. VIOV - Dividend Comparison
PSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than VIOV's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSC Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.73% | 1.92% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 1.47% | 1.30% | 0.95% | 0.35% | 0.00% |
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 1.56% | 1.69% | 1.78% | 2.18% | 1.81% | 1.59% | 1.42% | 1.60% | 1.76% | 1.43% | 1.17% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSC and VIOV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSC has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to VIOV (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSC dropped -46.69% vs VIOV's -47.36%.
On 5-year performance, PSC leads with 8.77% vs 6.32% for VIOV. On fees, VIOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VIOV has been the lower-risk option at 4.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PSC has performed better with a 8.77% return vs 6.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for PSC.
VIOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.57% for PSC.
PSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VIOV is Small Cap Value Equities. PSC tracks Nasdaq US Small Cap Select Leaders TR Index, while VIOV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for PSC and 0.10% for VIOV.
VIOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSC and VIOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer