PY vs. KEAT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PY (Principal Value ETF) and KEAT (Keating Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Principal, while KEAT is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Keating. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PY returned 14.24% vs 24.92% for KEAT. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for KEAT.

Performance

PY vs. KEAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Value ETF (PY) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PY achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than KEAT's 9.05% return.

PY

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 1.70%
• YTD: 4.14%
• 6M: 4.52%
• 1Y: 14.24%
• 3Y*: 13.22%
• 5Y*: 7.32%
• 10Y*: 10.73%

KEAT

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: -1.47%
• YTD: 9.05%
• 6M: 9.91%
• 1Y: 24.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PY vs. KEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PY Principal Value ETF	4.14%	7.74%	8.73%
KEAT Keating Active ETF	9.05%	22.76%	2.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PY and KEAT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2024	0.53

The correlation between PY and KEAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PY vs. KEAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PY	KEAT
Technology	25.0%	-
Financial Services	16.5%	1.0%
Healthcare	12.0%	5.3%
Consumer Defensive	11.5%	22.2%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	-
Industrials	9.3%	4.3%
Energy	5.6%	30.9%
Communication Services	5.1%	15.0%
Utilities	1.7%	-
Basic Materials	1.2%	21.7%
Real Estate	1.1%	0.6%

Return for Risk

PY vs. KEAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PY

PY Risk / Return Rank: 41
PY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
PY Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
PY Omega Ratio Rank: 37
PY Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
PY Martin Ratio Rank: 47

KEAT

KEAT Risk / Return Rank: 73
KEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
KEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
KEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 73
KEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
KEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PY vs. KEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Value ETF (PY) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PY	KEAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	2.44	-1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	3.32	-1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.44	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	4.14	-1.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.73	11.38	-3.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PY vs. KEAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PY Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the KEAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PY and KEAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PY	KEAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	2.44	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	1.52	-0.99

Drawdowns

PY vs. KEAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PY drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than KEAT's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PY and KEAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PY	KEAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.44%	-7.45%	-37.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.20%	-6.04%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.00%	-5.92%	+4.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.05%	-1.57%	-3.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	2.20%	-0.35%

Volatility

PY vs. KEAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Value ETF (PY) is 2.28%, while Keating Active ETF (KEAT) has a volatility of 2.55%. This indicates that PY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PY	KEAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.28%	2.55%	-0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.28%	8.32%	-1.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.53%	10.25%	+0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.77%	10.27%	+5.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.07%	10.27%	+9.80%

PY vs. KEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than KEAT's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

PY vs. KEAT - Dividend Comparison

PY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than KEAT's 2.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
KEAT Keating Active ETF	2.25%	2.48%	1.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PY Principal Value ETF	2.13%	2.14%	2.22%	2.68%	3.02%	2.83%	2.95%	2.25%	2.34%	1.68%	1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PY and KEAT in my portfolio?

PY and KEAT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PY or KEAT?

KEAT has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to PY (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PY dropped -45.44% vs KEAT's -7.45%.

Which ETF is better, PY or KEAT?

On 1-year performance, KEAT leads with 24.92% vs 14.24% for PY. On fees, PY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PY has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PY or KEAT?

Over the 1-year period, KEAT has performed better with a 24.92% return vs 14.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PY or KEAT?

PY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for KEAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PY or KEAT?

KEAT has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 2.13% for PY.

What is the main difference between PY and KEAT?

PY is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while KEAT is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Keating. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PY and 0.85% for KEAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KEAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.