KEAT vs. VTV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

KEAT (Keating Active ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KEAT is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Keating, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. KEAT is actively managed, while VTV is passively managed. Over the past year, KEAT returned 25.42% vs 27.94% for VTV. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. KEAT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.

Performance

KEAT vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Keating Active ETF (KEAT) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEAT achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 16.37% return.

KEAT

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 4.95%
• 6M: 3.71%
• YTD: 10.28%
• 1Y: 25.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.29%

VTV

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: 11.27%
• YTD: 16.37%
• 1Y: 27.94%
• 3Y*: 17.12%
• 5Y*: 12.29%
• 10Y*: 12.57%
• ALL TIME*: 9.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KEAT Keating Active ETF	$40.28K	$122.03K	$129.65K
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	$688.19M	$688.42M	$619.05M

KEAT vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KEAT Keating Active ETF	10.28%	22.76%	3.10%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	16.37%	15.27%	7.61%

Correlation

The correlation between KEAT and VTV is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024	0.59

The correlation between KEAT and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

KEAT vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KEAT

KEAT Risk / Return Rank: 79
KEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
KEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
KEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 90
KEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
KEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 56

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 93
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 93
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KEAT vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Keating Active ETF (KEAT) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KEAT	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	2.62	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	3.74	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.47	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	4.24	-1.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.68	16.42	-9.74

KEAT vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEAT and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KEAT vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEAT drawdown since its inception was -10.59%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEAT and VTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	KEAT	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.59%	-59.27%	+48.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.59%	-6.35%	-4.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.04%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.86%	-1.36%	-3.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.99%	-7.82%	+5.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.83%	1.64%	+2.19%

Volatility

KEAT vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Keating Active ETF (KEAT) is 2.45%, while Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) has a volatility of 2.62%. This indicates that KEAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KEAT	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.45%	2.62%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.88%	7.72%	+1.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.87%	10.36%	+0.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.37%	13.82%	-3.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.37%	16.61%	-6.24%

KEAT vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEAT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

KEAT vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

KEAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than VTV's 1.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KEAT Keating Active ETF	2.51%	2.48%	1.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.86%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KEAT and VTV in my portfolio?

KEAT and VTV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KEAT or VTV?

VTV has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to KEAT (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEAT dropped -10.59% vs VTV's -59.27%.

Which ETF is better, KEAT or VTV?

On 1-year performance, VTV leads with 27.94% vs 25.42% for KEAT. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, KEAT has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KEAT or VTV?

Over the 1-year period, VTV has performed better with a 27.94% return vs 25.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KEAT or VTV?

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for KEAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KEAT or VTV?

KEAT has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 1.86% for VTV.

What is the main difference between KEAT and VTV?

KEAT is categorized as Global Allocation, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Keating and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for KEAT and 0.04% for VTV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.