PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PXS.TO vs. CUD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

PXS.TO vs. CUD.TO

Last updated Jun 17, 2026

PXS.TO (Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD) and CUD.TO (iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - PXS.TO tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index while CUD.TO tracks the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats CAD Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXS.TO returned 14.57%/yr vs 6.42%/yr for CUD.TO. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PXS.TO charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for CUD.TO.

Performance

PXS.TO vs. CUD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO) and iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CUD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXS.TO achieves a 17.13% return, which is significantly higher than CUD.TO's 8.24% return. Over the past 10 years, PXS.TO has outperformed CUD.TO with an annualized return of 14.57%, while CUD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.42% annualized return.

PXS.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
5.04%
YTD
17.13%
6M
18.30%
1Y
36.32%
3Y*
22.47%
5Y*
15.63%
10Y*
14.57%

CUD.TO

1D
-0.25%
1M
4.34%
YTD
8.24%
6M
3.69%
1Y
8.24%
3Y*
5.94%
5Y*
2.99%
10Y*
6.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXS.TO vs. CUD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXS.TO
Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD		17.13%13.64%26.23%12.41%-2.47%32.84%4.71%21.47%-1.23%8.36%
CUD.TO
iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		8.24%1.82%6.21%0.19%-2.23%19.11%-2.35%21.38%-5.05%14.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PXS.TO and CUD.TO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2015

0.36

The correlation between PXS.TO and CUD.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.38 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD

iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with PXS.TO:
PXS.TO vs. ESGC.TOPXS.TO vs. EQL.TOPXS.TO vs. INAI.TOPXS.TO vs. EQLI.TOPXS.TO vs. ESG.TOPXS.TO vs. FCUV.TOPXS.TO vs. QQC-F.TO
Often compared with CUD.TO:
CUD.TO vs. CDZ.TOCUD.TO vs. XHU.TOCUD.TO vs. DGROCUD.TO vs. CYH.TOCUD.TO vs. SCHDCUD.TO vs. ^GSPCCUD.TO vs. VDY.TO

Return for Risk

PXS.TO vs. CUD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PXS.TO
PXS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PXS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
CUD.TO
CUD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CUD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CUD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXS.TO vs. CUD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO) and iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CUD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

PXS.TOCUD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.36
0.62

+2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.93
0.95

+3.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.13

+0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.58

0.94

+6.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.00

2.41

+24.58

PXS.TO vs. CUD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the CUD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXS.TO and CUD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXS.TO vs. CUD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXS.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.87%, smaller than the maximum CUD.TO drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXS.TO and CUD.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

PXS.TOCUD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.87%

-38.35%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.88%

-8.76%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.36%

-15.25%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.36%

-20.31%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.87%

-38.35%

+6.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.20%

+2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.36%

-4.60%

+1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

3.42%

-2.05%

Volatility

PXS.TO vs. CUD.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CUD.TO) at 2.89%. This indicates that PXS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CUD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

PXS.TOCUD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

2.89%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.40%

10.70%

-2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

13.31%

-2.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.28%

15.65%

-2.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.28%

17.77%

-2.49%

PXS.TO vs. CUD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXS.TO has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than CUD.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

PXS.TO vs. CUD.TO - Dividend Comparison

PXS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than CUD.TO's 1.91% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CUD.TO
iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		1.91%2.08%1.84%2.05%1.92%2.16%2.25%1.82%2.25%1.59%1.94%1.89%
PXS.TO
Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD		1.23%1.49%1.53%1.53%1.80%1.51%2.51%1.91%1.84%1.50%1.62%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

PXS.TO and CUD.TO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PXS.TO is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PXS.TO is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for CUD.TO.

PXS.TO tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, while CUD.TO tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats CAD Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for PXS.TO and 0.66% for CUD.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXS.TO and CUD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer