PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXS.TO vs. EQL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXS.TO vs. EQL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXS.TO achieves a 17.13% return, which is significantly higher than EQL.TO's 13.25% return.


PXS.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
5.04%
YTD
17.13%
6M
18.30%
1Y
36.32%
3Y*
22.47%
5Y*
15.63%
10Y*
14.57%

EQL.TO

1D
-0.27%
1M
7.16%
YTD
13.25%
6M
12.99%
1Y
24.01%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXS.TO vs. EQL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PXS.TO
Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD
17.13%13.64%26.23%12.41%-2.47%32.84%4.71%21.47%-4.37%
EQL.TO
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD
13.25%5.94%21.37%11.36%-6.24%28.55%10.48%22.14%-5.01%

Correlation

The correlation between PXS.TO and EQL.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2018

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between PXS.TO and EQL.TO has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXS.TO vs. EQL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXS.TO
PXS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PXS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

EQL.TO
EQL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EQL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
EQL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXS.TO vs. EQL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXS.TOEQL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.35

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.58

3.58

+4.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.00

12.82

+14.18

PXS.TO vs. EQL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the EQL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXS.TO and EQL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXS.TO vs. EQL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXS.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.87%, roughly equal to the maximum EQL.TO drawdown of -33.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXS.TO and EQL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXS.TOEQL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.87%

-33.08%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.88%

-6.73%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.36%

-17.25%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.36%

-18.73%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.27%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.36%

-3.99%

+0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

1.88%

-0.51%

Volatility

PXS.TO vs. EQL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO) is 3.93%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that PXS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXS.TOEQL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

4.26%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.40%

9.23%

-0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

12.08%

-1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.28%

14.35%

-1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.28%

16.92%

-1.64%

PXS.TO vs. EQL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXS.TO has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than EQL.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXS.TO vs. EQL.TO - Dividend Comparison

PXS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, which matches EQL.TO's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQL.TO
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD
1.23%1.38%0.97%1.39%1.51%1.30%2.00%1.12%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PXS.TO
Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD
1.23%1.49%1.53%1.53%1.80%1.51%2.51%1.91%1.84%1.50%1.62%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXS.TO and EQL.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EQL.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQL.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for PXS.TO.

PXS.TO is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while EQL.TO is S&P 500. PXS.TO tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, while EQL.TO tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for PXS.TO and 0.25% for EQL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXS.TO and EQL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer