PortfoliosLab logo
CUD.TO vs. SCHD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CUD.TO and SCHD is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

CUD.TO vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CUD.TO) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CUD.TO:

0.13

SCHD:

0.10

Sortino Ratio

CUD.TO:

0.26

SCHD:

0.30

Omega Ratio

CUD.TO:

1.04

SCHD:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

CUD.TO:

0.11

SCHD:

0.13

Martin Ratio

CUD.TO:

0.34

SCHD:

0.42

Ulcer Index

CUD.TO:

5.16%

SCHD:

5.06%

Daily Std Dev

CUD.TO:

14.82%

SCHD:

16.29%

Max Drawdown

CUD.TO:

-38.36%

SCHD:

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

CUD.TO:

-7.37%

SCHD:

-10.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUD.TO achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's -3.97% return. Over the past 10 years, CUD.TO has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 6.38%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 10.36% annualized return.


CUD.TO

YTD

0.85%

1M

2.40%

6M

-5.25%

1Y

1.89%

5Y*

10.03%

10Y*

6.38%

SCHD

YTD

-3.97%

1M

1.56%

6M

-8.72%

1Y

1.64%

5Y*

13.44%

10Y*

10.36%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CUD.TO vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CUD.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CUD.TO vs. SCHD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUD.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CUD.TO is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CUD.TO is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CUD.TO is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CUD.TO is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CUD.TO is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CUD.TO is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHD is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHD is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHD is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHD is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHD is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHD is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CUD.TO vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CUD.TO) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CUD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUD.TO and SCHD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CUD.TO vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

CUD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than SCHD's 4.00% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CUD.TO
iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
1.84%1.84%2.05%1.92%2.07%2.14%1.73%2.14%1.51%1.85%1.80%4.72%
SCHD
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
4.00%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%2.63%

Drawdowns

CUD.TO vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUD.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.36%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUD.TO and SCHD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CUD.TO vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CUD.TO) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) have volatilities of 4.79% and 4.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...