PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CUD.TO vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CUD.TO^GSPC
YTD Return13.05%25.48%
1Y Return21.18%33.14%
3Y Return (Ann)2.61%8.55%
5Y Return (Ann)5.57%13.96%
10Y Return (Ann)7.58%11.39%
Sharpe Ratio2.362.91
Sortino Ratio3.353.88
Omega Ratio1.421.55
Calmar Ratio1.874.20
Martin Ratio13.2618.80
Ulcer Index1.83%1.90%
Daily Std Dev10.28%12.27%
Max Drawdown-38.36%-56.78%
Current Drawdown-2.24%-0.27%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between CUD.TO and ^GSPC is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

CUD.TO vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CUD.TO achieves a 13.05% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 25.48% return. Over the past 10 years, CUD.TO has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 7.58%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.39% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.75%
12.99%
CUD.TO
^GSPC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CUD.TO vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CUD.TO) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CUD.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CUD.TO, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.40
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CUD.TO, currently valued at 1.97, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.97
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CUD.TO, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CUD.TO, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.87
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CUD.TO, currently valued at 6.56, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.56
^GSPC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 2.61, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.61
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 3.50, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.50
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.49
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 3.73, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.73
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 16.66, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0016.66

CUD.TO vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUD.TO and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.40
2.61
CUD.TO
^GSPC

Drawdowns

CUD.TO vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUD.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.36%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUD.TO and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.46%
-0.27%
CUD.TO
^GSPC

Volatility

CUD.TO vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CUD.TO) is 3.20%, while S&P 500 (^GSPC) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that CUD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.20%
3.75%
CUD.TO
^GSPC