PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXS.TO vs. QQC-F.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXS.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PXS.TO having a 17.13% return and QQC-F.TO slightly higher at 17.54%. Over the past 10 years, PXS.TO has underperformed QQC-F.TO with an annualized return of 14.57%, while QQC-F.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.48% annualized return.


PXS.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
5.04%
YTD
17.13%
6M
18.30%
1Y
36.32%
3Y*
22.47%
5Y*
15.63%
10Y*
14.57%

QQC-F.TO

1D
-1.79%
1M
2.97%
YTD
17.54%
6M
18.09%
1Y
34.68%
3Y*
24.44%
5Y*
15.28%
10Y*
20.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXS.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXS.TO
Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD
17.13%13.64%26.23%12.41%-2.47%32.84%4.71%21.47%-1.23%8.36%
QQC-F.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
17.54%18.79%24.19%52.81%-33.42%27.15%45.04%37.63%-2.23%31.94%

Correlation

The correlation between PXS.TO and QQC-F.TO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2015

0.31

The correlation between PXS.TO and QQC-F.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXS.TO vs. QQC-F.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXS.TO
PXS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PXS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

QQC-F.TO
QQC-F.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXS.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXS.TOQQC-F.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.35

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.58

2.68

+4.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.00

9.75

+17.25

PXS.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXS.TO and QQC-F.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXS.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXS.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.87%, smaller than the maximum QQC-F.TO drawdown of -36.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXS.TO and QQC-F.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXS.TOQQC-F.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.87%

-36.03%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.88%

-12.98%

+8.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.36%

-22.76%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.36%

-36.03%

+19.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.87%

-36.03%

+4.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.20%

+2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.36%

-5.49%

+2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

3.57%

-2.20%

Volatility

PXS.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO) is 3.93%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that PXS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQC-F.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXS.TOQQC-F.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

7.78%

-3.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.40%

13.88%

-5.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

17.32%

-6.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.28%

22.66%

-9.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.28%

22.65%

-7.37%

PXS.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXS.TO has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than QQC-F.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXS.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Dividend Comparison

PXS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than QQC-F.TO's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXS.TO
Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD
1.23%1.49%1.53%1.53%1.80%1.51%2.51%1.91%1.84%1.50%1.62%1.40%
QQC-F.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
0.34%0.39%0.50%0.57%0.89%0.66%0.49%0.64%0.77%0.66%0.81%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXS.TO and QQC-F.TO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQC-F.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQC-F.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for PXS.TO.

PXS.TO is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while QQC-F.TO is Nasdaq-100. PXS.TO tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, while QQC-F.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for PXS.TO and 0.20% for QQC-F.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXS.TO and QQC-F.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer