PXQSX vs. NEAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX).
PXQSX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Jun 28, 2006. NEAGX is managed by Needham. It was launched on Sep 4, 2001.
Performance
PXQSX vs. NEAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PXQSX vs. NEAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQSX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund | 0.43% | -4.50% | 9.63% | 19.10% | -24.29% | 19.50% | 28.16% | 24.87% | -15.95% | 18.90% |
NEAGX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund | 11.92% | 26.40% | 14.31% | 37.65% | -27.53% | 37.56% | 51.53% | 43.82% | -16.09% | 8.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXQSX achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than NEAGX's 11.92% return. Over the past 10 years, PXQSX has underperformed NEAGX with an annualized return of 7.85%, while NEAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.04% annualized return.
PXQSX
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- -7.60%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -0.65%
- 3Y*
- 6.85%
- 5Y*
- -0.34%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
NEAGX
- 1D
- 4.33%
- 1M
- -7.75%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 6M
- 14.19%
- 1Y
- 60.51%
- 3Y*
- 26.85%
- 5Y*
- 15.03%
- 10Y*
- 18.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PXQSX vs. NEAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXQSX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAGX's 1.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PXQSX vs. NEAGX — Risk / Return Rank
PXQSX
NEAGX
PXQSX vs. NEAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXQSX | NEAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.01 | 2.14 | -2.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.16 | 2.71 | -2.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.38 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.06 | 4.27 | -4.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.13 | 15.19 | -15.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXQSX | NEAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 | 2.14 | -2.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.62 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.76 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.59 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between PXQSX and NEAGX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PXQSX vs. NEAGX - Dividend Comparison
PXQSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, more than NEAGX's 1.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQSX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund | 5.79% | 5.81% | 4.90% | 2.99% | 3.37% | 1.76% | 0.82% | 0.80% | 2.54% | 5.32% | 8.89% | 7.58% |
NEAGX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund | 1.91% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.10% | 3.91% | 10.64% | 16.57% | 5.17% | 6.72% | 11.88% |
Drawdowns
PXQSX vs. NEAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXQSX drawdown since its inception was -55.56%, which is greater than NEAGX's maximum drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXQSX and NEAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXQSX | NEAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.56% | -41.80% | -13.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.25% | -14.01% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.49% | -36.31% | +4.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.65% | -36.31% | -1.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.69% | -7.75% | -5.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -8.72% | -1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.85% | 3.93% | +1.92% |
Volatility
PXQSX vs. NEAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX) is 5.71%, while Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that PXQSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PXQSX | NEAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 11.64% | -5.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.75% | 19.84% | -8.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.73% | 28.93% | -9.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.22% | 24.33% | -4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.45% | 23.90% | -3.45% |