PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXQSX vs. BIASX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXQSX vs. BIASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX) and Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXQSX achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than BIASX's 15.98% return. Over the past 10 years, PXQSX has underperformed BIASX with an annualized return of 8.18%, while BIASX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.18% annualized return.


PXQSX

1D
-0.99%
1M
0.32%
6M
3.22%
YTD
8.56%
1Y
6.65%
3Y*
6.72%
5Y*
1.36%
10Y*
8.18%
ALL TIME*
8.11%

BIASX

1D
0.63%
1M
-1.20%
6M
12.06%
YTD
15.98%
1Y
20.74%
3Y*
7.43%
5Y*
1.49%
10Y*
9.18%
ALL TIME*
7.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PXQSX vs. BIASX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXQSX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund
8.56%-4.50%9.63%19.10%-24.29%19.50%28.16%24.87%-15.95%18.90%
BIASX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund
15.98%2.29%4.29%12.43%-20.27%7.31%31.78%36.26%-4.47%16.91%

Correlation

The correlation between PXQSX and BIASX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2006

0.87

The correlation between PXQSX and BIASX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXQSX vs. BIASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PXQSX
PXQSX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PXQSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXQSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXQSX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PXQSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXQSX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

BIASX
BIASX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BIASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIASX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
BIASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIASX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PXQSX vs. BIASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX) and Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXQSXBIASXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.17

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

1.60

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.61

5.89

-5.29

PXQSX vs. BIASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXQSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the BIASX Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXQSX and BIASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXQSX vs. BIASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXQSX drawdown since its inception was -55.56%, smaller than the maximum BIASX drawdown of -73.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXQSX and BIASX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXQSXBIASXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.56%

-73.26%

+17.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.25%

-10.93%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.87%

-24.98%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.49%

-30.61%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.65%

-38.04%

+0.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.71%

-2.20%

-4.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.28%

-23.35%

+13.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.56%

3.00%

+3.56%

Volatility

PXQSX vs. BIASX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX) at 3.99%. This indicates that PXQSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXQSXBIASXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

3.99%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.17%

12.91%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.96%

17.58%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

19.90%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.49%

19.93%

+0.56%

PXQSX vs. BIASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXQSX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than BIASX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXQSX vs. BIASX - Dividend Comparison

PXQSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, less than BIASX's 16.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIASX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund
16.92%19.62%5.78%0.00%8.22%13.22%0.78%4.00%5.17%1.69%3.50%16.77%
PXQSX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund
5.35%5.81%4.90%2.99%3.37%1.76%0.82%0.80%2.54%5.32%8.89%7.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXQSX and BIASX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXQSX has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to BIASX (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXQSX dropped -55.56% vs BIASX's -73.26%.

BIASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXQSX and BIASX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer