PXJ vs. JPLD
PXJ (Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF) and JPLD (J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXJ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index, while JPLD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan. PXJ is passively managed, while JPLD is actively managed. Over the past year, PXJ returned 82.76% vs 4.71% for JPLD. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. PXJ charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for JPLD.
Performance
PXJ vs. JPLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXJ achieves a 46.18% return, which is significantly higher than JPLD's 1.04% return.
PXJ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -6.26%
- YTD
- 46.18%
- 6M
- 38.54%
- 1Y
- 82.76%
- 3Y*
- 24.79%
- 5Y*
- 17.27%
- 10Y*
- -0.80%
JPLD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PXJ vs. JPLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF | 46.18% | 8.74% | 0.21% | -1.72% |
JPLD J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF | 1.04% | 6.01% | 6.49% | 3.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXJ and JPLD is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2023 | -0.08 |
PXJ vs. JPLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXJ
JPLD
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Energy
PXJ
JPLD
Industrials
PXJ
JPLD
Utilities
PXJ
JPLD
Financial Services
PXJ
JPLD
Basic Materials
PXJ
-
JPLD
Communication Services
PXJ
-
JPLD
Consumer Cyclical
PXJ
-
JPLD
Consumer Defensive
PXJ
-
JPLD
Healthcare
PXJ
-
JPLD
Real Estate
PXJ
-
JPLD
Technology
PXJ
-
JPLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXJ vs. JPLD — Risk / Return Rank
PXJ
JPLD
PXJ vs. JPLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXJ | JPLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.17 | 3.22 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.92 | 5.29 | -1.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.68 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.24 | 4.71 | +3.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.98 | 21.78 | +2.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXJ | JPLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.17 | 3.22 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 3.25 | -3.29 |
Drawdowns
PXJ vs. JPLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXJ drawdown since its inception was -94.82%, which is greater than JPLD's maximum drawdown of -1.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXJ and JPLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXJ | JPLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.82% | -1.17% | -93.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.10% | -1.00% | -9.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.60% | -0.12% | -66.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.67% | -0.15% | -55.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 0.22% | +3.24% |
Volatility
PXJ vs. JPLD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) at 0.37%. This indicates that PXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXJ | JPLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.75% | 0.37% | +7.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.30% | 0.97% | +17.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.41% | 1.47% | +24.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.57% | 1.83% | +32.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.47% | 1.83% | +37.64% |
PXJ vs. JPLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLD's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXJ vs. JPLD - Dividend Comparison
PXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than JPLD's 4.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPLD J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF | 4.21% | 4.24% | 4.47% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF | 2.21% | 2.91% | 3.34% | 1.99% | 0.65% | 2.40% | 4.72% | 1.87% | 0.99% | 2.75% | 1.18% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXJ and JPLD have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXJ has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to JPLD (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXJ dropped -94.82% vs JPLD's -1.17%.
On 1-year performance, PXJ leads with 82.76% vs 4.71% for JPLD. On fees, JPLD is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JPLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PXJ has performed better with a 82.76% return vs 4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPLD is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PXJ.
JPLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 2.21% for PXJ.
PXJ is categorized as Energy Equities, while JPLD is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PXJ and 0.24% for JPLD.
JPLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 3.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXJ and JPLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer