PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXI vs. XLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXI vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXI achieves a 30.24% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 4.68% return. Over the past 10 years, PXI has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 6.10%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.44% annualized return.


PXI

1D
-1.58%
1M
8.31%
6M
18.66%
YTD
30.24%
1Y
41.05%
3Y*
11.63%
5Y*
21.98%
10Y*
6.10%
ALL TIME*
5.64%

XLG

1D
1.74%
1M
1.81%
6M
4.68%
YTD
4.68%
1Y
17.86%
3Y*
21.61%
5Y*
14.02%
10Y*
16.44%
ALL TIME*
11.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.58M$2.88M$1.34M
$59.56M$59.06M$102.51M

PXI vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXI
Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF
30.24%3.86%0.76%5.48%45.85%75.05%-35.91%1.67%-27.56%-8.42%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
4.68%19.51%33.49%38.16%-24.29%30.77%24.15%32.04%-3.59%23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between PXI and XLG is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006

0.50

The correlation between PXI and XLG shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PXI vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXI
XLG

Energy

95.0%
2.5%

Basic Materials

3.9%
0.6%

Industrials

0.8%
1.9%

Financial Services

0.3%
10.3%

Communication Services

-

13.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.1%

Healthcare

-

6.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

49.8%

Utilities

-

0.7%

Energy

PXI
95.0%
XLG
2.5%

Basic Materials

PXI
3.9%
XLG
0.6%

Industrials

PXI
0.8%
XLG
1.9%

Financial Services

PXI
0.3%
XLG
10.3%

Communication Services

PXI

-

XLG
13.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PXI

-

XLG
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

PXI

-

XLG
5.1%

Healthcare

PXI

-

XLG
6.8%

Real Estate

PXI

-

XLG

-

Technology

PXI

-

XLG
49.8%

Utilities

PXI

-

XLG
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXI vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PXI
PXI Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

XLG
XLG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PXI vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXIXLGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.22

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

1.44

+1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.15

4.49

+4.66

PXI vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXI Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXI and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXI vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXI drawdown since its inception was -85.08%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXI and XLG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXIXLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.08%

-52.39%

-32.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.40%

-12.41%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.74%

-20.70%

-10.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.47%

-28.02%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.55%

-30.46%

-49.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.12%

-4.09%

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.25%

-7.62%

-21.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

3.98%

+0.52%

Volatility

PXI vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 5.30%. This indicates that PXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXIXLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.28%

5.30%

+1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.97%

11.66%

+6.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.42%

14.73%

+7.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.81%

18.91%

+13.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.94%

18.93%

+18.01%

PXI vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXI vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

PXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than XLG's 0.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXI
Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF
1.26%1.81%1.52%1.82%3.14%0.57%1.72%2.80%0.93%0.80%0.73%2.07%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
0.64%0.64%0.72%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXI and XLG have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXI has higher volatility (7.28%) compared to XLG (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXI dropped -85.08% vs XLG's -52.39%.

On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 16.44% vs 6.10% for PXI. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 16.44% return vs 6.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PXI.

PXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.64% for XLG.

PXI is categorized as Momentum, while XLG is S&P 500. PXI tracks Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PXI and 0.20% for XLG.

PXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXI and XLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer