PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXI vs. ULVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXI vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXI achieves a 32.39% return, which is significantly higher than ULVM's 15.73% return.


PXI

1D
0.75%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
32.39%
6M
24.73%
1Y
46.96%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
16.60%
10Y*
5.94%

ULVM

1D
0.78%
1M
3.75%
YTD
15.73%
6M
15.57%
1Y
30.22%
3Y*
21.62%
5Y*
11.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXI vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXI
Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF
32.39%3.86%0.76%5.48%45.85%75.05%-35.91%1.67%-27.56%15.88%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
15.73%15.84%19.76%10.16%-9.04%31.06%3.51%22.08%-12.07%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between PXI and ULVM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between PXI and ULVM has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PXI vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXI
ULVM

Energy

95.6%
3.4%

Basic Materials

4.4%
4.1%

Industrials

0.9%
12.2%

Communication Services

-

3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Financial Services

-

22.5%

Healthcare

-

10.1%

Real Estate

-

8.7%

Technology

-

13.1%

Utilities

-

12.6%

Energy

PXI
95.6%
ULVM
3.4%

Basic Materials

PXI
4.4%
ULVM
4.1%

Industrials

PXI
0.9%
ULVM
12.2%

Communication Services

PXI

-

ULVM
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PXI

-

ULVM
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

PXI

-

ULVM
4.7%

Financial Services

PXI

-

ULVM
22.5%

Healthcare

PXI

-

ULVM
10.1%

Real Estate

PXI

-

ULVM
8.7%

Technology

PXI

-

ULVM
13.1%

Utilities

PXI

-

ULVM
12.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXI vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXI
PXI Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXI Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ULVM
ULVM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ULVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULVM Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ULVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXI vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXIULVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.49

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.36

4.69

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.35

19.45

-6.11

PXI vs. ULVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXI Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the ULVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXI and ULVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXIULVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

2.83

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.75

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.58

-0.42

Drawdowns

PXI vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXI drawdown since its inception was -85.08%, which is greater than ULVM's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXI and ULVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXIULVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.08%

-40.71%

-44.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.83%

-6.47%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.74%

-18.14%

-12.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.47%

-19.77%

-13.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.55%

0.00%

-3.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.43%

-5.75%

-23.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

1.56%

+1.97%

Volatility

PXI vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) at 2.97%. This indicates that PXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXIULVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.81%

2.97%

+4.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.32%

7.99%

+8.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.36%

10.75%

+10.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.47%

15.48%

+17.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.18%

18.85%

+18.33%

PXI vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ULVM's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXI vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison

PXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than ULVM's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXI
Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF
1.28%1.81%1.52%1.82%3.14%0.57%1.72%2.80%0.93%0.80%0.73%2.07%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
1.56%1.81%1.57%1.94%1.91%1.36%1.51%1.88%1.67%0.38%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXI and ULVM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXI has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to ULVM (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXI dropped -85.08% vs ULVM's -40.71%.

On 5-year performance, PXI leads with 16.60% vs 11.61% for ULVM. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PXI has performed better with a 16.60% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PXI.

ULVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 1.28% for PXI.

PXI tracks Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PXI and 0.20% for ULVM.

ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXI and ULVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer