PXI vs. NLR
PXI (Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXI is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index, while NLR is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXI returned 5.94%/yr vs 13.59%/yr for NLR. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PXI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.
Performance
PXI vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXI achieves a 32.39% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's 5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, PXI has underperformed NLR with an annualized return of 5.94%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively higher 13.59% annualized return.
PXI
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- 32.39%
- 6M
- 24.73%
- 1Y
- 46.96%
- 3Y*
- 18.93%
- 5Y*
- 16.60%
- 10Y*
- 5.94%
NLR
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -6.93%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- -3.03%
- 1Y
- 36.83%
- 3Y*
- 34.44%
- 5Y*
- 21.90%
- 10Y*
- 13.59%
PXI vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 32.39% | 3.86% | 0.76% | 5.48% | 45.85% | 75.05% | -35.91% | 1.67% | -27.56% | -8.42% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 5.93% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 13.63% | 3.49% | 0.20% | 4.94% | 8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXI and NLR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2007 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PXI and NLR has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PXI vs. NLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXI
NLR
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
PXI
NLR
Basic Materials
PXI
NLR
-
Industrials
PXI
NLR
Communication Services
PXI
-
NLR
-
Consumer Cyclical
PXI
-
NLR
-
Consumer Defensive
PXI
-
NLR
-
Financial Services
PXI
-
NLR
-
Healthcare
PXI
-
NLR
-
Real Estate
PXI
-
NLR
-
Technology
PXI
-
NLR
Utilities
PXI
-
NLR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXI vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
PXI
NLR
PXI vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXI | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.17 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.36 | 1.43 | +2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.35 | 2.91 | +10.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXI | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 0.88 | +1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.75 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.57 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.18 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
PXI vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXI drawdown since its inception was -85.08%, which is greater than NLR's maximum drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXI and NLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXI | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.08% | -65.05% | -20.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.83% | -25.80% | +14.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.74% | -30.48% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.47% | -30.48% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.55% | -34.35% | -45.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.55% | -19.95% | +16.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.43% | -35.72% | +6.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 12.67% | -9.14% |
Volatility
PXI vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) is 7.81%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.14%. This indicates that PXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXI | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.81% | 13.14% | -5.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.32% | 32.76% | -16.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.36% | 42.29% | -20.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.47% | 29.24% | +4.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.18% | 24.02% | +13.16% |
PXI vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXI vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
PXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than NLR's 2.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 2.41% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 1.28% | 1.81% | 1.52% | 1.82% | 3.14% | 0.57% | 1.72% | 2.80% | 0.93% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXI and NLR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NLR has higher volatility (13.14%) compared to PXI (7.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXI dropped -85.08% vs NLR's -65.05%.
On 10-year performance, NLR leads with 13.59% vs 5.94% for PXI. On fees, NLR is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, PXI has been the lower-risk option at 7.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NLR has performed better with a 13.59% return vs 5.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NLR is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PXI.
NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 1.28% for PXI.
PXI is categorized as Momentum, while NLR is Alternative Energy Equities. PXI tracks Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PXI and 0.56% for NLR.
PXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXI and NLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer