PXI vs. DFMC
PXI (Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF) and DFMC (Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXI is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index, while DFMC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors. PXI is passively managed, while DFMC is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. PXI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DFMC.
Performance
PXI vs. DFMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PXI
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- -9.31%
- YTD
- 20.99%
- 6M
- 20.69%
- 1Y
- 27.45%
- 3Y*
- 15.32%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 5.57%
DFMC
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 6.12%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PXI vs. DFMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | -6.13% |
DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF | 18.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXI and DFMC is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2026 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXI vs. DFMC — Risk / Return Rank
PXI
DFMC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PXI vs. DFMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF (DFMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXI | DFMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.86 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXI vs. DFMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXI drawdown since its inception was -85.08%, which is greater than DFMC's maximum drawdown of -4.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXI and DFMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXI | DFMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.08% | -4.29% | -80.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.86% | 0.00% | -11.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.37% | -0.73% | -28.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | — | — |
Volatility
PXI vs. DFMC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXI | DFMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.97% | 16.13% | +5.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.40% | 16.13% | +17.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.11% | 16.13% | +20.98% |
PXI vs. DFMC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DFMC's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXI vs. DFMC - Dividend Comparison
PXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, while DFMC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 1.36% | 1.81% | 1.52% | 1.82% | 3.14% | 0.57% | 1.72% | 2.80% | 0.93% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXI and DFMC have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DFMC is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DFMC is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PXI.
PXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.00% for DFMC.
PXI is categorized as Momentum, while DFMC is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Dimensional Fund Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PXI and 0.41% for DFMC.
Find the right allocation for PXI and DFMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer