PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXH vs. SCHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXH vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXH achieves a 12.73% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 22.49% return. Over the past 10 years, PXH has underperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 10.91%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.55% annualized return.


PXH

1D
0.66%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
12.73%
6M
14.41%
1Y
29.04%
3Y*
20.06%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
10.91%

SCHA

1D
1.16%
1M
5.29%
YTD
22.49%
6M
19.84%
1Y
41.48%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
11.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXH vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
12.73%31.44%12.09%13.93%-15.18%8.31%-1.91%16.77%-8.68%26.60%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
22.49%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%26.50%-11.79%14.94%

Correlation

The correlation between PXH and SCHA is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.64

The correlation between PXH and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

PXH vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXH
SCHA

Financial Services

25.8%
15.3%

Technology

19.9%
23.9%

Energy

13.0%
5.4%

Basic Materials

12.1%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
9.0%

Communication Services

6.2%
2.3%

Industrials

4.6%
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
2.5%

Utilities

2.4%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.7%
5.9%

Healthcare

0.9%
13.2%

Financial Services

PXH
25.8%
SCHA
15.3%

Technology

PXH
19.9%
SCHA
23.9%

Energy

PXH
13.0%
SCHA
5.4%

Basic Materials

PXH
12.1%
SCHA
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PXH
10.7%
SCHA
9.0%

Communication Services

PXH
6.2%
SCHA
2.3%

Industrials

PXH
4.6%
SCHA
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

PXH
2.8%
SCHA
2.5%

Utilities

PXH
2.4%
SCHA
2.3%

Real Estate

PXH
1.7%
SCHA
5.9%

Healthcare

PXH
0.9%
SCHA
13.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXH vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXH
PXH Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXH Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXH Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXH vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXHSCHADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

4.38

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.21

16.08

-5.88

PXH vs. SCHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXH and SCHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXH vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXH drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXH and SCHA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXHSCHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.63%

-42.41%

-21.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-9.50%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.72%

-27.29%

+9.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.59%

-30.79%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.42%

-42.41%

+1.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.27%

0.00%

-3.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.84%

-7.57%

-9.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

2.59%

+0.26%

Volatility

PXH vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) have volatilities of 6.41% and 6.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXHSCHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

6.62%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.09%

13.67%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.90%

18.62%

-2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.87%

22.03%

-4.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.06%

22.75%

-2.69%

PXH vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXH vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

PXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than SCHA's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXH
Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
3.49%4.02%4.43%4.84%5.33%4.69%2.79%3.28%3.30%2.74%1.97%3.44%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
0.98%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXH and SCHA have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHA has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to PXH (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXH dropped -63.63% vs SCHA's -42.41%.

On 10-year performance, SCHA leads with 11.55% vs 10.91% for PXH. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PXH has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 11.55% return vs 10.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PXH.

PXH has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.98% for SCHA.

PXH is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SCHA is Small Cap Blend Equities. PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PXH and 0.04% for SCHA.

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXH and SCHA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer