PXF vs. SCHP
PXF (Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index, while SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXF returned 12.26%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for SCHP. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. PXF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
PXF vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXF achieves a 18.79% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, PXF has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 12.26%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.60% annualized return.
PXF
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 18.79%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- 1Y
- 39.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.81%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.26%
SCHP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.60%
PXF vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 18.79% | 42.51% | 4.54% | 18.46% | -9.09% | 15.93% | 2.58% | 17.50% | -14.84% | 24.52% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 1.42% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXF and SCHP is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010 | -0.03 |
The correlation between PXF and SCHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PXF vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXF
SCHP
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
PXF
SCHP
Industrials
PXF
SCHP
-
Technology
PXF
SCHP
-
Energy
PXF
SCHP
-
Consumer Cyclical
PXF
SCHP
Basic Materials
PXF
SCHP
-
Healthcare
PXF
SCHP
-
Consumer Defensive
PXF
SCHP
-
Communication Services
PXF
SCHP
-
Utilities
PXF
SCHP
-
Real Estate
PXF
SCHP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXF vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
PXF
SCHP
PXF vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXF | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.25 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 2.45 | +1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.76 | 7.41 | +6.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXF vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXF drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXF and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXF | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.74% | -14.26% | -50.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.91% | -1.93% | -8.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.06% | -4.48% | -9.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.82% | -14.26% | -12.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.59% | -14.26% | -27.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.04% | -0.44% | -1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.25% | -3.93% | -11.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 0.64% | +2.26% |
Volatility
PXF vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) has a higher volatility of 6.76% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.02%. This indicates that PXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXF | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.76% | 1.02% | +5.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.95% | 2.24% | +11.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.18% | 3.30% | +12.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 6.12% | +10.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 5.59% | +12.48% |
PXF vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXF vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
PXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than SCHP's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 3.12% | 3.64% | 3.48% | 3.55% | 3.58% | 3.74% | 2.11% | 3.50% | 3.38% | 2.78% | 3.21% | 3.10% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.99% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXF and SCHP have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXF has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to SCHP (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXF dropped -64.74% vs SCHP's -14.26%.
On 10-year performance, PXF leads with 12.26% vs 2.60% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PXF has performed better with a 12.26% return vs 2.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PXF.
SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 3.12% for PXF.
PXF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PXF and 0.03% for SCHP.
PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXF and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer