PXF vs. PSI
PXF (Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF) and PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index, while PSI is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXF returned 12.26%/yr vs 34.59%/yr for PSI. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PXF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PSI.
Performance
PXF vs. PSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXF achieves a 18.79% return, which is significantly lower than PSI's 112.90% return. Over the past 10 years, PXF has underperformed PSI with an annualized return of 12.26%, while PSI has yielded a comparatively higher 34.59% annualized return.
PXF
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 18.79%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- 1Y
- 41.20%
- 3Y*
- 23.81%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.26%
PSI
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- 9.80%
- YTD
- 112.90%
- 6M
- 110.54%
- 1Y
- 207.41%
- 3Y*
- 55.80%
- 5Y*
- 32.57%
- 10Y*
- 34.59%
PXF vs. PSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 18.79% | 42.51% | 4.54% | 18.46% | -9.09% | 15.93% | 2.58% | 17.50% | -14.84% | 24.52% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 112.90% | 36.32% | 17.17% | 49.06% | -34.43% | 46.55% | 56.75% | 52.49% | -11.55% | 40.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXF and PSI is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2007 | 0.60 |
The correlation between PXF and PSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
PXF vs. PSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXF
PSI
Financial Services
-
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
PXF
PSI
-
Technology
PXF
PSI
Industrials
PXF
PSI
Consumer Cyclical
PXF
PSI
-
Basic Materials
PXF
PSI
-
Energy
PXF
PSI
-
Healthcare
PXF
PSI
-
Consumer Defensive
PXF
PSI
-
Communication Services
PXF
PSI
-
Utilities
PXF
PSI
-
Real Estate
PXF
PSI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXF vs. PSI — Risk / Return Rank
PXF
PSI
PXF vs. PSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXF | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.63 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 12.90 | -9.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.76 | 45.29 | -31.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXF vs. PSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXF drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, roughly equal to the maximum PSI drawdown of -62.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXF and PSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXF | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.74% | -62.96% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.91% | -15.48% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.06% | -41.07% | +27.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.82% | -44.85% | +18.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.59% | -44.85% | +3.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.04% | 0.00% | -2.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.25% | -15.92% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 4.40% | -1.50% |
Volatility
PXF vs. PSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) is 6.76%, while Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a volatility of 18.89%. This indicates that PXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXF | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.76% | 18.89% | -12.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.95% | 33.67% | -19.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.18% | 40.58% | -24.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 38.44% | -21.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 35.42% | -17.35% |
PXF vs. PSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PSI's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXF vs. PSI - Dividend Comparison
PXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than PSI's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 0.04% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.40% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.52% | 0.83% | 0.21% | 0.68% | 0.16% |
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 3.12% | 3.64% | 3.48% | 3.55% | 3.58% | 3.74% | 2.11% | 3.50% | 3.38% | 2.78% | 3.21% | 3.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXF and PSI have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSI has higher volatility (18.89%) compared to PXF (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXF dropped -64.74% vs PSI's -62.96%.
On 10-year performance, PSI leads with 34.59% vs 12.26% for PXF. On fees, PXF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PXF has been the lower-risk option at 6.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSI has performed better with a 34.59% return vs 12.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PXF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PSI.
PXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 0.04% for PSI.
PXF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PSI is Semiconductors. PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index, while PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PXF and 0.56% for PSI.
PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.92 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXF and PSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer