PXF vs. MFG
PXF (Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index, while MFG (Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, PXF returned 12.26%/yr vs 15.72%/yr for MFG. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PXF vs. MFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXF achieves a 18.79% return, which is significantly lower than MFG's 32.24% return. Over the past 10 years, PXF has underperformed MFG with an annualized return of 12.26%, while MFG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.72% annualized return.
PXF
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 18.79%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- 1Y
- 41.20%
- 3Y*
- 23.81%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.26%
MFG
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- 11.39%
- YTD
- 32.24%
- 6M
- 31.34%
- 1Y
- 78.46%
- 3Y*
- 51.80%
- 5Y*
- 30.84%
- 10Y*
- 15.72%
PXF vs. MFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 18.79% | 42.51% | 4.54% | 18.46% | -9.09% | 15.93% | 2.58% | 17.50% | -14.84% | 24.52% |
MFG Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 32.24% | 54.60% | 47.85% | 26.14% | 17.09% | 2.40% | -15.06% | 3.00% | -17.58% | 3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXF and MFG is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2007 | 0.52 |
The correlation between PXF and MFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXF vs. MFG — Risk / Return Rank
PXF
MFG
PXF vs. MFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXF | MFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.40 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 3.11 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.76 | 8.25 | +5.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXF vs. MFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXF drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, smaller than the maximum MFG drawdown of -80.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXF and MFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXF | MFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.74% | -80.57% | +15.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.91% | -24.78% | +13.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.06% | -28.33% | +14.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.82% | -28.33% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.59% | -49.87% | +8.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.04% | -4.06% | +2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.25% | -60.82% | +45.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 9.31% | -6.41% |
Volatility
PXF vs. MFG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) is 6.76%, while Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) has a volatility of 10.09%. This indicates that PXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXF | MFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.76% | 10.09% | -3.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.95% | 24.20% | -10.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.18% | 30.69% | -14.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 29.66% | -13.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 26.49% | -8.42% |
Dividends
PXF vs. MFG - Dividend Comparison
PXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than MFG's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFG Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 0.96% | 2.68% | 3.20% | 3.73% | 4.34% | 2.76% | 2.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.86% | 3.77% | 3.10% |
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 3.12% | 3.64% | 3.48% | 3.55% | 3.58% | 3.74% | 2.11% | 3.50% | 3.38% | 2.78% | 3.21% | 3.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXF and MFG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFG has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to PXF (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXF dropped -64.74% vs MFG's -80.57%.
MFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXF and MFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer