PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXF vs. MFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXF vs. MFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXF achieves a 18.79% return, which is significantly lower than MFG's 32.24% return. Over the past 10 years, PXF has underperformed MFG with an annualized return of 12.26%, while MFG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.72% annualized return.


PXF

1D
0.34%
1M
0.69%
YTD
18.79%
6M
20.98%
1Y
41.20%
3Y*
23.81%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
12.26%

MFG

1D
1.68%
1M
11.39%
YTD
32.24%
6M
31.34%
1Y
78.46%
3Y*
51.80%
5Y*
30.84%
10Y*
15.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXF vs. MFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
18.79%42.51%4.54%18.46%-9.09%15.93%2.58%17.50%-14.84%24.52%
MFG
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
32.24%54.60%47.85%26.14%17.09%2.40%-15.06%3.00%-17.58%3.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PXF and MFG is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2007

0.52

The correlation between PXF and MFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXF vs. MFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXF
PXF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXF Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

MFG
MFG Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFG Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
MFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFG Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXF vs. MFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXFMFGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.40

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

3.11

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.76

8.25

+5.51

PXF vs. MFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the MFG Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXF and MFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXF vs. MFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXF drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, smaller than the maximum MFG drawdown of -80.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXF and MFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXFMFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.74%

-80.57%

+15.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.91%

-24.78%

+13.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.06%

-28.33%

+14.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

-28.33%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.59%

-49.87%

+8.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.04%

-4.06%

+2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.25%

-60.82%

+45.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

9.31%

-6.41%

Volatility

PXF vs. MFG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) is 6.76%, while Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) has a volatility of 10.09%. This indicates that PXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXFMFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

10.09%

-3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.95%

24.20%

-10.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.18%

30.69%

-14.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.62%

29.66%

-13.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.07%

26.49%

-8.42%

Dividends

PXF vs. MFG - Dividend Comparison

PXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than MFG's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFG
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
0.96%2.68%3.20%3.73%4.34%2.76%2.71%0.00%0.00%1.86%3.77%3.10%
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
3.12%3.64%3.48%3.55%3.58%3.74%2.11%3.50%3.38%2.78%3.21%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXF and MFG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFG has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to PXF (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXF dropped -64.74% vs MFG's -80.57%.

MFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXF and MFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer