PXF vs. IXN
PXF (Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF) and IXN (iShares Global Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index, while IXN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXF returned 12.26%/yr vs 25.03%/yr for IXN. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PXF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXN.
Performance
PXF vs. IXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXF achieves a 18.79% return, which is significantly lower than IXN's 33.08% return. Over the past 10 years, PXF has underperformed IXN with an annualized return of 12.26%, while IXN has yielded a comparatively higher 25.03% annualized return.
PXF
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 18.79%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- 1Y
- 41.20%
- 3Y*
- 23.81%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.26%
IXN
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 33.08%
- 6M
- 35.17%
- 1Y
- 62.93%
- 3Y*
- 32.38%
- 5Y*
- 21.51%
- 10Y*
- 25.03%
PXF vs. IXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 18.79% | 42.51% | 4.54% | 18.46% | -9.09% | 15.93% | 2.58% | 17.50% | -14.84% | 24.52% |
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 33.08% | 25.25% | 24.84% | 52.98% | -29.86% | 29.58% | 43.62% | 47.88% | -5.44% | 41.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXF and IXN is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2007 | 0.69 |
The correlation between PXF and IXN shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PXF vs. IXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXF
IXN
Financial Services
-
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Financial Services
PXF
IXN
-
Technology
PXF
IXN
Industrials
PXF
IXN
Consumer Cyclical
PXF
IXN
-
Basic Materials
PXF
IXN
-
Energy
PXF
IXN
Healthcare
PXF
IXN
Consumer Defensive
PXF
IXN
-
Communication Services
PXF
IXN
-
Utilities
PXF
IXN
-
Real Estate
PXF
IXN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXF vs. IXN — Risk / Return Rank
PXF
IXN
PXF vs. IXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXF | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.42 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 4.39 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.76 | 14.35 | -0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXF vs. IXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXF drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than IXN's maximum drawdown of -55.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXF and IXN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXF | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.74% | -55.67% | -9.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.91% | -13.80% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.06% | -25.55% | +11.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.82% | -36.30% | +9.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.59% | -36.30% | -5.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.04% | -6.68% | +4.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.25% | -11.26% | -3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 4.21% | -1.31% |
Volatility
PXF vs. IXN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) is 6.76%, while iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) has a volatility of 12.01%. This indicates that PXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXF | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.76% | 12.01% | -5.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.95% | 20.45% | -6.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.18% | 24.03% | -7.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 25.19% | -8.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 24.58% | -6.51% |
PXF vs. IXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than IXN's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXF vs. IXN - Dividend Comparison
PXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than IXN's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 0.78% | 1.04% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.81% | 0.58% | 0.63% | 1.06% | 0.94% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 1.12% |
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 3.12% | 3.64% | 3.48% | 3.55% | 3.58% | 3.74% | 2.11% | 3.50% | 3.38% | 2.78% | 3.21% | 3.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXF and IXN have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXN has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to PXF (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXF dropped -64.74% vs IXN's -55.67%.
On 10-year performance, IXN leads with 25.03% vs 12.26% for PXF. On fees, PXF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PXF has been the lower-risk option at 6.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IXN has performed better with a 25.03% return vs 12.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PXF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXN.
PXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 0.78% for IXN.
PXF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IXN is Technology Equities. PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index, while IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PXF and 0.46% for IXN.
IXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXF and IXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer