PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXF vs. EFV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXF vs. EFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXF achieves a 20.42% return, which is significantly higher than EFV's 9.13% return. Over the past 10 years, PXF has outperformed EFV with an annualized return of 11.80%, while EFV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.75% annualized return.


PXF

1D
-0.70%
1M
6.92%
YTD
20.42%
6M
24.34%
1Y
44.15%
3Y*
25.13%
5Y*
13.47%
10Y*
11.80%

EFV

1D
-0.78%
1M
2.26%
YTD
9.13%
6M
12.94%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
21.99%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
9.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXF vs. EFV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
20.42%42.51%4.54%18.46%-9.09%15.93%2.58%17.50%-14.84%24.52%
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
9.13%42.22%5.35%18.85%-5.22%11.08%-2.97%15.80%-14.67%21.22%

Correlation

The correlation between PXF and EFV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2007

0.94

The correlation between PXF and EFV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

PXF vs. EFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXF
EFV

Financial Services

19.7%
36.9%

Industrials

15.1%
10.2%

Technology

11.4%
4.3%

Energy

10.6%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
4.8%

Basic Materials

10.1%
7.5%

Healthcare

7.2%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
8.3%

Communication Services

4.3%
4.4%

Utilities

3.6%
5.9%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.5%

Financial Services

PXF
19.7%
EFV
36.9%

Industrials

PXF
15.1%
EFV
10.2%

Technology

PXF
11.4%
EFV
4.3%

Energy

PXF
10.6%
EFV
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PXF
10.2%
EFV
4.8%

Basic Materials

PXF
10.1%
EFV
7.5%

Healthcare

PXF
7.2%
EFV
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

PXF
6.1%
EFV
8.3%

Communication Services

PXF
4.3%
EFV
4.4%

Utilities

PXF
3.6%
EFV
5.9%

Real Estate

PXF
1.8%
EFV
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXF vs. EFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXF
PXF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXF Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXF Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

EFV
EFV Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXF vs. EFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXFEFVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.92

1.97

+0.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.83

2.73

+1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.36

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

2.57

+1.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.61

9.57

+6.03

PXF vs. EFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the EFV Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXF and EFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXFEFVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

1.97

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.76

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.55

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.27

-0.03

Drawdowns

PXF vs. EFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXF drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, roughly equal to the maximum EFV drawdown of -63.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXF and EFV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXFEFVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.74%

-63.94%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.91%

-10.90%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.06%

-13.72%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

-25.84%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.59%

-43.16%

+1.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-2.51%

+1.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.27%

-14.83%

-0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.91%

-0.07%

Volatility

PXF vs. EFV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) at 4.52%. This indicates that PXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXFEFVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

4.52%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.86%

11.56%

+1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.24%

14.21%

+1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.45%

15.96%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

17.86%

+0.18%

PXF vs. EFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EFV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXF vs. EFV - Dividend Comparison

PXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than EFV's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
3.81%4.16%4.66%4.36%4.17%4.07%2.42%4.62%4.56%3.56%3.28%3.59%
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
3.07%3.64%3.48%3.55%3.58%3.74%2.11%3.50%3.38%2.78%3.21%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, PXF and EFV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PXF has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to EFV (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXF dropped -64.74% vs EFV's -63.94%.

On 10-year performance, PXF leads with 11.80% vs 9.75% for EFV. On fees, EFV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, EFV has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PXF has performed better with a 11.80% return vs 9.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PXF.

EFV has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 3.07% for PXF.

PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index, while EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PXF and 0.39% for EFV.

PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXF and EFV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer