PXE vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PXE (Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production Intellidex Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXE returned 8.45%/yr vs 17.28%/yr for XLG. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PXE charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

PXE vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXE achieves a 33.42% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 8.03% return. Over the past 10 years, PXE has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 8.45%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.28% annualized return.

PXE

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -4.54%
• YTD: 33.42%
• 6M: 22.41%
• 1Y: 40.52%
• 3Y*: 16.07%
• 5Y*: 18.51%
• 10Y*: 8.45%

XLG

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 4.19%
• YTD: 8.03%
• 6M: 7.64%
• 1Y: 28.88%
• 3Y*: 24.70%
• 5Y*: 16.34%
• 10Y*: 17.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXE vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PXE Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF	33.42%	-2.82%	-1.86%	7.69%	58.32%	94.04%	-36.76%	-1.69%	-23.35%	1.02%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	8.03%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between PXE and XLG is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2005	0.48

The correlation between PXE and XLG shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PXE vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PXE	XLG
Energy	97.4%	2.7%
Basic Materials	2.6%	0.6%
Financial Services	0.3%	9.6%
Communication Services	-	17.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.8%
Healthcare	-	7.0%
Industrials	-	1.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	43.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PXE vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXE

PXE Risk / Return Rank: 45
PXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
PXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
PXE Omega Ratio Rank: 38
PXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
PXE Martin Ratio Rank: 44

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 60
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 65
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXE vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PXE	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	2.18	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	2.95	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.38	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	2.34	+0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.07	8.77	-1.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PXE vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXE Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXE and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PXE	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	2.18	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.88	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	0.92	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.63	-0.45

Drawdowns

PXE vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXE drawdown since its inception was -83.99%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXE and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PXE	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.99%	-52.39%	-31.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.89%	-12.41%	-1.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.65%	-20.70%	-16.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.65%	-28.02%	-9.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.17%	-30.46%	-49.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.71%	-1.02%	-6.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.99%	-7.64%	-20.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.74%	3.30%	+2.44%

Volatility

PXE vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) has a higher volatility of 9.57% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 3.19%. This indicates that PXE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PXE	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.57%	3.19%	+6.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.70%	9.81%	+10.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.44%	13.32%	+14.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.66%	18.68%	+14.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.98%	18.84%	+18.14%

PXE vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXE has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

PXE vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

PXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than XLG's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PXE Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF	2.00%	2.98%	2.54%	2.78%	3.03%	1.86%	4.10%	1.70%	1.29%	1.54%	6.62%	2.58%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PXE and XLG in my portfolio?

PXE and XLG have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PXE or XLG?

PXE has higher volatility (9.57%) compared to XLG (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXE dropped -83.99% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, PXE or XLG?

On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 17.28% vs 8.45% for PXE. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PXE or XLG?

Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 17.28% return vs 8.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PXE or XLG?

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PXE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PXE or XLG?

PXE has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.60% for XLG.

What is the main difference between PXE and XLG?

PXE is categorized as Energy Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. PXE tracks Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production Intellidex Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PXE and 0.20% for XLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.